this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2024
459 points (98.5% liked)

World News

38977 readers
2499 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Apollo42@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The South Vietnamese governments were all extremely repressive and pretty much openly fascist. The US pretty much didn't care so long as they were opposed to communism (a recurring theme in US cold war foreign policy)..

[–] btaf45@lemmy.world -2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

So much of that was wrong. The last government was not "openly fascist" Thanks to the USA, it was democratically elected. North Vietnam was 100x more repressive than South Vietnam in 1975.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Vietnam

Under pressure from the US, they held elections for president and the legislature in 1967. The Senate election took place on 2 September 1967. The Presidential election took place on 3 September 1967

[–] Apollo42@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The US should really be congratulated for not installing a fully fascist puppet government that one time.

Even in that last election, 57% of the voting age population voted, which sounds great but it was 84% of those eligible to vote. Huge swathes of the population were not allowed to vote due to their political beliefs or past opposition to the government.

[–] btaf45@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Even in that last election, 57% of the voting age population voted

That was actually better than most countries.

The big picture is that the Vietnamese dictatorship did exactly the wrong thing. Creating a billionaire class proves that they ditched socialism. But they kept the dictatorship. They should have instead entrenched socialism and become a democracy. That would have been a very interesting thing to see. That they did exactly the wrong thing proves that North Vietnam's entire reason for fighting the war was a farce.

[–] Apollo42@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Are they really fair elections if the communist parties, the ones with large rural support, are banned from taking part?