this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2024
459 points (98.5% liked)

World News

38977 readers
2499 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] btaf45@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

They were not fighting against capitalism, they were fighting for independence.

Both North Vietnam and South Vietnam gained their independence in 1954. So whatever they were fighting for in the 1960's, it was definitely not "independence".

The history is fascinating

Yeah, but I was talking about the Vietnam War against north and south of the 1960's. Not the separate colonial war against France in the 1950's.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

That isn't how they saw the situation. Colonial powers drawing lines on maps has famously been a way to make people happy with outcomes

https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLdUa84NB-3eiXhRtECg8mwCr6JDwgPtty&si=yC8tKjh058A9uxZo

Here is some fun documentaries to watch

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 2 points 6 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/playlist?list=PLdUa84NB-3eiXhRtECg8mwCr6JDwgPtty&si=yC8tKjh058A9uxZo

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] btaf45@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

That isn’t how they saw the situation

"They" == North Vietnamese propaganda. The actual facts are that colonialism ended 10 full years before the US sent troops to protect South Vietnam. This was a civil war, not a colonial war. It doesn't matter what North Vietnamese propaganda wants you to think. It matters what reality is. If all your information is coming from youtube you are definitely getting your information from the wrong sources.

Colonial powers drawing lines on maps has famously been a way to make people happy with outcomes

Doesn't apply at all here. The only 'border' they were fighting over was the border between North and South Vietnam. And that border was created by North Vietnam, not by any colonialists.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 points 6 months ago

I'm happy to read better references on the real political situation you can give me.