this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2024
272 points (96.6% liked)

Not The Onion

12180 readers
772 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/15285204

Defeated CEOs are now conceding hybrid working is here to stay

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dpunked@feddit.de 32 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I completely agree with you and am happy that my employer peddled back when the decided we should all come back to the office. Going to the office has many more negatives than benefits for everyone. I sadly learned that a lot of local city councils give incentives and tax breaks for companies to bring back the people so they can stimulate the local economy by eating the unhealthy shit that we can usually find around offices and be stuck in traffic for an hour.

[–] kambusha@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I sadly learned that a lot of local city councils give incentives and tax breaks for companies to bring back the people

Where did you learn about that, if you don't mind me asking. I've seen this repeated multiple times, but never seen a source.

[–] Khanzarate@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2023-02-21/another-threat-to-work-from-home-tax-breaks

This suggests it's not necessarily a malicious thing as suggested, but just pre-covid rules that expect businesses to not do significant work from home.

Still, it means a lot of businesses are making this decision with tax breaks in mind.

[–] kambusha@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago
[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Damn, I had not thought of that. It's the opposite here as the public transport network is overburdened and underfunded, so they don't mind the daily commuters working from home instead. But of course I hadn't considered eateries. 🤔

[–] thetreesaysbark@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Eateries can adapt though, as they adapted to commuters.

It hasn't always been the case that all eateries were only in major city centres. For a long time there were local cafes in small town/village centres that today just don't exist because there hasn't been anyone around in the day to eat at them.

I like the idea that we may see a return of more local cafes/restaurants (at least I see this being possible in my country), but I'm not sure how likely it is given the smaller turn over there's likely to be.

When I worked in an office there were often food vans that drove to each car park offering lunches. If they improved the lunches they offered I could also see something similar to this in suburban areas.