this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2024
590 points (89.0% liked)

politics

18840 readers
3820 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

While rebutting another post here on Lemmy, I ran into this. This says exactly what I want to say.

I am not a friend of Biden's Administration. I think they drug their feet over a variety of things ranging from holding Trump and his goons accountable for January 6th through rulemaking on issues like OTC Birth Control and abortion rights, and yes, I think he's too quick to please big business. But then I remember what the alternative is, and ... well, disappointed in Biden or not, I'm voting for him. Because my wife is a Black bisexual goth woman, four strikes under Team Pepe's tent. And I have my own strikes for marrying her as a White dude, and respecting her right to not have kids since she doesn't want them is another strike against me. And I care about my Non-Christian, Gay, Transgender, and Minority friends, and will never willingly subject them to Team Pepe.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jaemo@sh.itjust.works -2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

after the election I'm going to actively criticize everything about the Democratic party I can so that we have a chance to get a progressive candidate in 2028.

That's how it's supposed to happen.

You won't get the option if the other side wins.

[–] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Well we've had that option for over three years and for over three years Biden has told us to go fuck ourselves. If that's how the system is supposed to work then the system isn't worth defending for me. I'll leave that to the people who actually benefit from it.

[–] capital@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I’ll leave that to the people who actually benefit from it.

Was it better or worse when states couldn't just outright ban abortion? Would you say women "benefited" from the previous policy?

[–] shikitohno@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Man, it sure would have been nice if the Democrats had actually eliminated the filibuster and legislated abortion rights after Roe v Wade, instead of just campaigning on the threat of a GOP majority overturning it somehow. Almost like they didn't actually give a damn about trying to solve that one, and just wanted to look like they cared. They could have had this done and sorted in the first years of Clinton's or Obama's presidencies and chose not to. Let's see how many decades they campaign on swearing that, this time, they're totally going to do something to settle the matter, for real.

[–] capital@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I wish it were that simple.

Do you actually believe Dems even had the majority they needed to make it a law even when in power? Dems are not a monolith.

During the first 2 years of Obama's presidency they focused on the economic crisis and healthcare reform. The latter, if you recall, even got fucked up because of one guy costing us the public option.

But none of this changes the fact that on this subject, we had something better before now.

[–] shikitohno@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Republicans can get their people in Congress to fall in line, but somehow Democrats always come out with "Gee, that rascally Lieberman/Manchin/Sinema, guess there's nothing we can do" and don't put any effective pressure on these people or get rid of them with someone who don't turn out to just be colorblind Republicans that will sabotage the platform.

Democrats have chances to take action to address these problems and keep tripping over themselves on the same stupid stuff, then try to shout down increasingly disaffected voters with "The other ones are worse than us, vote for us and we won't drop the ball again!"

[–] capital@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I remember that sentiment being shared when Manchin was doing some stupid ass thing or another. EVERY time anyone asked those people what EXACTLY they suggested anyone do to him to force him to change, they had no real answer.

I just assume all Republicans have some dirty shit in their past that their party can lean on them with.

Now's your chance. What could Biden or anyone else do to force Manchin to do what he wants?

[–] shikitohno@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Gee, I don't know, primary him with someone that actually delivers on stuff and doesn't hold things hostage on a power trip and back the hell out of that candidate? Tell him that if he doesn't get in line, they'll actively block his future attempts at getting some pork barrel spending pushed through for WV? Literally anything besides throwing up their hands and saying "We've tried nothing and it didn't work, guess that's it. We just have to deal with this guy until he retires, I guess." would have been a great start.

[–] capital@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

primary him with someone that actually delivers on stuff and doesn’t hold things hostage on a power trip and back the hell out of that candidate?

This whole fucking post is about how we're kind of stuck with the least bad of 2 bad options because of our voting system and you just suggested running someone against a Dem which would risk getting a Republican elected.... On top of expecting a more progressive candidate to win in West Fucking Virginia.

Tell him that if he doesn’t get in line, they’ll actively block his future attempts at getting some pork barrel spending pushed through for WV?

Maybe? This is so milquetoast though and I'd be surprised if it hasn't already happened.

[–] shikitohno@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

Well, doing absolutely nothing about him and similar candidates has turned out so well for them, hasn't it? This is the sort of garbage justification that has voters increasingly disillusioned with the Democratic party. We're supposed to believe they'll actually deliver on any of the much more difficult parts of their platform with Republican opposition that will be much worse when they can't even get an idiot like Manchin or Sinema to fall in line when it actually matters, and can't do anything about it? Like, that was supposed to be the whole deal with Manchin to begin with, that we accept he'll push back on things a bit, but he'll fall in with the party when it counts. How's that played out lately?

If this is the best strategy the Democrats could cobble together, they may as well just quit politics, hand the reins over to the christofascists and stop pretending at this point.

[–] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I'd invite you to zoom out a little bit.

You know who wasn't affected by the abortion ban? Anybody with enough money to move or travel. While they've got you distracted with what they're giving you permission to do you're letting them take away your ability to simply walk away.

Far more people have been harmed by the suppression of wages than any specific policy you can think of and it crosses over race, gender and age. Procorporatism is at the root of what's killing us and Democrats are right there with Republicans making it happen.

[–] capital@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You know who wasn’t affected by the abortion ban? Anybody with enough money to move or travel.

"I've got the means and time to travel hundreds of miles if I need an abortion and I'm not that bothered that many don't."

Got it...

[–] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Whether or not the abortion ban affects me directly doesn't change the fact: Everybody is affected by wage suppression.