this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2024
51 points (78.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43905 readers
1381 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] assembly@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago (3 children)

That is true but at the same time, a line has to be drawn somewhere. If we just let Russia win because they have nukes, there is nothing to stop them from invading and absorbing other neighbors. We can’t let the threat of nukes keep us from doing anything and allowing for Russia and China to just invade anywhere they want.

[–] bennieandthez@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Only the US and Europe has the unalienable right to invade and bomb anywhere they want.

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 2 points 7 months ago (3 children)

We can’t let the threat of nukes keep us from doing anything and allowing for Russia and China to just invade anywhere they want.

I'm sorry, but yes-we-fucking-can.

Jesus, people here are so fucking blood thirsty that they're willing to entertain nuclear-fucking-holocaust just to 'draw a line in the sand'

Friendly reminder that the US has already been 'invading anywhere they want' - I sure am glad the baddies aren't as eager as the good guys are to glass half the planet.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee -2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The alternative to this “line in the sand” is the eventual destruction of all things beautiful and good at the hands of the world’s most evil people.

Stop being naive.

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 1 points 7 months ago

The alternative to this “line in the sand” is the eventual destruction of all things beautiful and good at the hands of the world’s most evil people.

Lmao who's being naive?