this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2024
441 points (86.1% liked)

Political Memes

5452 readers
2741 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Me too. Thanks.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Soup@lemmy.world 36 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

And are they pro-gun where it’s on the side or do they talk about being all supportive while prioritizing it over healthcare and actually well supported and well researched economic policy? I think guns are neat and used to have my license but I’d never put them ahead of literally any issue. Progun politicians don’t build better societies or respect people’s basic human rights.

Kinda sick of the “I care about human rights up until they affect my ability to own a firearm” group. They’re just tiresome.

[–] Solemn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm in Texas right now, and tbh I feel like Democrats would be able to do a lot more good here if they let go of gun control for now and focused on actually being electable in Texas so they can work on the multitudes of other issues there are to fix. You could even probably reduce shootings by fixing social issues, but you have to be elected first. If they did well long enough to prove some more liberal ideas work, people may trust them enough for gun control to happen one day.

[–] AquaTofana@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Bruh, after Beto lost to Greg Fucking Pissbaby Asshole Fuckface Abbott, I started to think the Dems here are doing it on purpose. Beto got decently close, and the only thing Republicans could play against him was the "Hell yeah I'm taking your guns!" Clip over and over. If they didn't have that clip of him getting emotional (in response to a hometown shooting), then he would have won.

I really am wondering why we don't have a decent pro-2A Dem candidate, and the only thing I can think is that Texas Dems don't want to win.

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

The backbone of the Democrats as a party is the reliable fundraising from the liberal-conservative dems. The corpo Dems like Biden and Harris. They allow the progressives to say the promises and then withhold those promises. Those corporate pandering Dems are also the ones who scream loudest about guns being evil instead of finding understanding, like so many other issues.

Those corporate Dems are also likely to collab with Conservatives and then say "I know they have only been acting in bad faith for a decade but maybe THIS time things will be different." And no one is surprised or learns anything. Then repeat.

Progress doesn't happen with corporations involved. Progress happens when decision are made and enforced upon corporations.

[–] credo@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I’m with OG OP, liberal with firearms. Raised in Texas, veteran, and came to my senses regarding the politics I was raised in. I both (a) like shooting and (b) feel the need to have home protection. I think they should be regulated.

With that, I don’t understand your comment at all.

being all supportive while prioritizing it over healthcare and actually well supported and well researched economic policy

I will be honest with you. This makes no sense. One is economic while the other is fanaticism. You are comparing apples to oranges. Let me flip your closing statement on you:

Kinda sick of the “I care about human rights up until they affect my ability to take away firearms” group.

Because, again, this proposed stalemate is idealists vs fanatics drawing lines in the sand. You can’t just blame one side. The fact there is no movement is the entire point of polarization in politics.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

It makes plenty of sense: There are scores of people who will vote for the absolute scum of the earth if it means they can keep their firearms. Losing even the slightest grip on their firearms is the dealbreaker and not the myriad of human rights abuses and other heinous shit conservative parties get up to.

You can separate the groups out all you want but it doesn’t matter once that vote is cast, and pro-gun politicians come with all the extra baggage. Your vote doesn’t come with a note saying “guns only, please don’t violate minorities’ rights/destroy the economy to enrich the least deserving people imaginable”. Your vote just says “yes” and they take that as far as they can go. They don’t give a shit about you or your opinion after you helped put them in power.

You know what will make you safer? Voting for parties that will create policy that helps reduce poverty. Unlike gun ownership that’s actually a well-documented way to make everyone safer.