308
submitted 2 months ago by ZeroCool@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 122 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I thought this was common knowledge months ago. Didn't Fox news even discover this shorty after they started pushing RFK Jr? I never understood why conservative media kept the RKF Jr train going after that was known.

Edit to add:

This also seems like a giant misunderstanding from the conservative side. They worship a name instead of ideology. The liberal side worships the ideology, irrespective of the name. Conservatives thought liberals would tie themselves to RFK Jr because thats what conservatives would do in the place of liberals. Whoops!

[-] ZeroCool@slrpnk.net 49 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I thought this was common knowledge months ago.

It was, at least among people who don't get all their information from Fox News, Breitbart or random neo-nazis on Twitter lol, but we don't stop election polling just because one poll was already conducted months ago.

[-] Fisk400@feddit.nu 16 points 2 months ago

I think the right is trying to push him back into the left as a Biden alternative now that Biden is a lot more unpopular than the last time they tried.

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 56 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

You're supporting my point about conservatives loving a name (and thinking liberals do too), instead of an ideology. Putting his batshit craziness aside for a moment, when I look at RFK Jrs policy positions, he's not a liberal. Why do conservatives think liberals would vote for a conservative?

His policies appear to be:

  • anti climate change initiatives
  • anti vaccination (even for things like measles!)
  • believes abortion is a tragedy, but said he'd allow it
  • thinks US support of Ukraine is a mistake, and thinks diplomacy would solve it instead (Has he not read the Budapest Memorandum?)
  • backs Texas's actions at the southern border
  • wants to make government backed 3% mortgages, but doesn't talk about where the money would come from or where all the new housing would either

source

Its crazy to think that comparing to RFK Jr, George W Bush is more liberal.

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Because other polls show him eating into Biden more. That’s why they were pushing him.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I never understood why conservative media kept the RKF Jr train going after that was known.

It makes for an excellent grift.

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Of whom? Certainly not liberals.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

No. But they're hardly the only people in America worth grifting.

Lots of smug Radical Centrists who can get suckered in with a No Labels party.

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I had to look up what a "Radical Centrist" was.

According to Wikipedia:

"The radical in the term refers to a willingness on the part of most radical centrists to call for fundamental reform of institutions.[1] The centrism refers to a belief that genuine solutions require realism and pragmatism, not just idealism and emotion.[2]"

I guess I would fit that definition, but nothing about RFK Jr is realistic or pragmatic. C'mon, him being anti-vax, and anti climate change fixes? What about that is realistic or pragmatic?

this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2024
308 points (97.8% liked)

politics

18075 readers
3150 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS