United States | News & Politics

1939 readers

1003 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

simsymbiote@midwest.social

Type1@midwest.social

249

Supreme Court will weigh banning homeless people from sleeping outside (apnews.com)

submitted 7 months ago by Type1@midwest.social to c/usa@midwest.social

111 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Maoo@hexbear.net 9 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Get a load of this lib that doesn't know virtually every Dem-run city provides full-throated support for the cops and pushes anti-homeless policies.

You ever stopped a sweep, lib?

[–] kamenoko@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 months ago

Turns out it's still better to be homeless in a lib city than a conservative shit hole town.

[–] ringwraithfish@startrek.website -1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

It's important to acknowledge the complexities of urban governance and the diverse approaches taken by different cities, regardless of political affiliation. While some cities may have policies that prioritize law enforcement and anti-homeless measures, others may take alternative approaches focused on community outreach, social services, and harm reduction. Each city faces unique challenges and adopts policies accordingly. If you have specific examples or cases you'd like to discuss, feel free to share, and we can explore them further.

[–] Maoo@hexbear.net 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

What a pretentious way to say, "some cities don't do that". Do you get paid to communicate like ChatGPT?

So given that you're asking for specific examples for the thing that is by far the norm, can I assume you know basically nothing about this topic

[–] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

check the account, it literally is chat gpt, whatever filter they were using broke and its giving failed replies half the time

[–] Maoo@hexbear.net 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

lol. It could also be that there's a person behind it feeding prompts to ChatGPT and pasting them back. That is exactly the kind of loser behavior I'd expect from someone with that comment history.

[–] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

either way it means they're a non-entity not worth acknowledging

[–] Maoo@hexbear.net 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Are you making fun of my habit of paying for ChatGPT and then giving it a prompt that says, "act like the suggest liberal you've ever seen" and then copy + pasting all of my comments so we can have a debate?

I dunno that sounds pretty problematic.

[–] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

huh?

[–] Maoo@hexbear.net 2 points 7 months ago

I'm making bad jokes over here

[–] oozynozh@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago

Never seen generative AI used to respond to a thread in a random forum, but here we are.