this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2024
76 points (98.7% liked)

technology

23206 readers
71 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] alexandra_kollontai@hexbear.net 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This is how ISO was corrupted when it came to docx.

Do you have any links to more info on this? Sounds interesting and I want to know more.

[โ€“] Maoo@hexbear.net 7 points 5 months ago

This seems like an okay overview: https://brattahlid.wordpress.com/2012/05/08/is-docx-really-an-open-standard/

Basically ODF was already a standard and perfectly sufficient to tweak for anything Word would ever need but Microsoft knew that they keep their monopoly secure, in part, by making other software fight to be compatible with Word documents. They also prefer to be in control of the entire ecosystem rather than implementing a shared standard. They proposed docx and other -x formats as their own open standard and were rejected until they more or less bought off ISO through donations and committee positions.

Microsoft then proceeded to make their own proprietary tweaks anyways, making it still very difficult to support the docx format.