this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
560 points (82.8% liked)

Political Memes

5488 readers
2795 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 18 points 7 months ago (8 children)

I see so much whining about tankies, and so few tankies.

Once world has defederated from .ml, which is the next instance to be designated the tankie instance?

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

I've been an active user since before lemmy.world, although I'm new to my current instance. Anecdotal but I now see far more comments to the effect of "tankies sure are gonna hate this", where tankies then never show up, than those where they do.

It's especially comical with the Lemmy.world users as their instance has blocked the largest sources of tankies. Even my alts in instances that haven't blocked .ml don't see anywhere near as many tankies as people griping about these tanky boogymen that have yet to arrive. I've even seen people who obviously aren't tankies or even tanky adjacent being accused of being one. I've been accused of being one for just pointing this all out.

I'll suggest a possibly unpopular opinion: the term tankies is turning into Lemmy's equivalent of "woke" - many of those using the term don't seem to know exactly what it means and its loose definition is expanding toward "anyone I don't like".

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Lemmy.world is generally filled with extremely ideological Liberals with no real niche interests represented by Lemmy.

Reddit is getting worse and worse. After all, how could it not? The profit motive ruins everythinh over time, after all. Therefore, the people who leave Reddit for Lemmy generally dislike the direction of Reddit, such as Marxists, Anarchists, and ideological Liberals.

This brings us to Lemmy. Lemmy.world is a microcosm of Reddit, it's the largest explicitly generalist instance. It's the fediverse for people who don't care about the fediverse, it's for refugees from Reddit. The problem is that the leftists are on different instances from Lemmy.world, because they go to the explicitly leftist instances, or other instances for niche interests.

That's why Lemmy.world represents Liberals too ideological to stay on Reddit, but who also aren't comfortable with Marxists or even Anarchists. It's Reddit 2.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I think you're 100% right. The OP and I just had a really good discussion that helped me understand the heart of our disagreement regarding their tanky take is different perceptions of Lemmy population tanky sentiment. I mostly see comments to the effect of "where are all these tanky comments?", a sentiment I share, versus "those aren't tankies, therefore it's not a tanky comment", some of which I think they've seen as tanky apologia. And maybe it is, I'm sure they've had their own unique Lemmy experience. Anyhow, it meant the implications of their statements are interpreted entirely differently between the two of us. This dovetails perfectly with your comment. Not necessarily that they're a liberal, as I can only guess about their beliefs, but that my experience on different, definitely more leftist instances is likely significantly different than theirs on .world.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yep, I agree. I think a particularly large part of it is that many on Lemmy.world are tangentially familiar with Marxism and Anarchism, but fundamentally have not yet engaged with the source material. A quick example is Marx's view on Government, which gets confused with Anarchistic by Liberals who have only heard "Stateless, Classless, Moneyless society" and stopped there, when Marx has always advocated for a Democratic World Republic.

That's why I try to spend a good amount of time trying to lead Liberals towards Leftist theory like Marx or Goldman, and towards Dialectical Materialism rather than Idealism. The Liberals on Lemmy.world are radical, but directionless, so actual Leftists are scary.

As for OP, they called me a "fascist" for saying voting isn't going to move America left, outside revolutionary pressure will. I have never advocated against voting, and have also expressed my intention to vote for Biden, but OP can't resist when it comes to punching left.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (7 children)

They admitted that they're quick on the draw, which I think explains the punching, but I don't think they're intentionally a bad actor. I think we're all dealing with the application of what you've so eloquently explained: we're talking about the same broad topics but using words and concepts that mean entirely different things depending on the commenter or reader, plus individual personality quirks. We're all definitely not always benevolent, patient, and reasonable, even when when we think we are.

When I put on my old "I'm liberal but think socialism is edgy cool despite misunderstanding what it is" hat from my younger years, I can see how a lot of things just in the few paragraphs we've written can seem really awful or scary. Outside revolutionary pressure? That's China, right? Tanky!

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (8 children)

What are you on about? lemmy.ml has always been a tankie instance, that was the first Lemmy instance and it was set up by the tankie devs.

And you're on lemmy.world, which has defederated from most of the extreme tankie instances anyway.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Could be the ratchet effect. Lemmygrad and Hexbear are both explicitly Marxist-Leninist, but .ml is explicitly FOSS and Privacy based, just with Marxist-Leninist admins.

I suppose the "next boogyman" will probably be an instance with a very lax defederation policy like Lemm.ee, db0, or Shitjustworks, if Lemmy.world ever defederates with Lemmy.ml. Either that, or Lemmy.world will jump ship to Sublinks and that will be an entirely different platform.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I mean there are communities dedicated to having a problem with Lemmy itself being developed by Marxist-Leninists. Not sure it'll stop at the instance level.

But hey: Shitjustworks defederated Lemmygrad since the admin doesn't like them and hexbear defederated shitjustworks, so I only ever see these kind of after-action-reports from the folks that go out searching for bad takes from those instances or wherever.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 months ago

My comment was more to the effect that since Lemmy doesn't really have a large number of Conservatives, the Left in general is the boogeyman for Liberals in Lemmy.world, and they largely won't stop punching leftward until they either become leftists themselves or they leave Lemmy (perhaps via Sublinks?).

[–] InternetUser2012@midwest.social 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

whatever one they all switch to so they can spread their bullshit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago (17 children)

Depends. Which one will be banning people for 'Sinophobia' for voicing anything other Critical Support For The Comrade-Chairman?

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] ns1@feddit.uk 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

If you haven't seen them you've been lucky. They are definitely out there

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (23 children)

The "I barely see any tankies on the fediverse!" types are usually concern trolls who don't mind tankies. Don't take it as genuine.

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 14 points 7 months ago

I barely see any tankies on the fediverse!

Because I block their instances and users on sight :3

load more comments (22 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (33 children)

There's a lot of tankies. You're one of them. Although you pretty narrowly focus on "biden bad" propaganda

load more comments (33 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)