this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2023
379 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37727 readers
635 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In its submission to the Australian government’s review of the regulatory framework around AI, Google said that copyright law should be altered to allow for generative AI systems to scrape the internet.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Derivative works are only copyright violations when they replicate substantial portions of the original without changes.

The entirety of human civilization is derivative works. Derivative works aren't infringement.

[–] lostmypasswordanew@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

It absolutely is. There's nothing out there in the past thousand years that isn't based on other prior art, copyright law only replies to direct copies, and there are explicit cutouts past that that allow you to directly copy some things if your work is transformative.