this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2024
515 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

59656 readers
2645 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (5 children)

People love to repeat this, but US companies aren't coming from a place of hostile intent like china's special brand of tik tok for the states.

[–] KrapKake@lemmy.world 31 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I'm not so sure about that, they seem pretty hostile to consumers and employees.

[–] endhits@lemmy.world 18 points 7 months ago (3 children)

They're both focused on profit. The only reason you see the other one as scary is because it's owned by the scary scary Chinese. Red scare all over again.

[–] jaschen@lemm.ee 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

No tiktok is not focused on profit. It literally has one of the worst/non existent monetization systems.

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Yup, vine ripoff with some tweaks and the same monetization issue

[–] jaschen@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Case in point. Vine literally can't survive and so shouldn't TikTok. Unless of course it's getting propped up by a government with endless funds and not focused on profits.

[–] retrieval4558@mander.xyz 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Why are you so convinced that an advertising platform that a 1/3rd of the country is glued to is unsustainable. And that's ignoring the rest of the world, which is the majority of their user base.

[–] jaschen@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago

The same reason why twitter was NEVER profitable and it had more eyes glued to it. World presidents were using twitter for announcements. Never profitable.

[–] jorp@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

What's the connection between Uber and China, then? I thought it was somewhat common for tech companies to be unprofitable for very long periods of time backed only by capital, but it may be China. Has anyone looked into this? Does Xi know what I like to order on weekends? Why haven't we banned this yet

[–] jaschen@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

I wouldn't consider Uber. This is closer to Vine vs TikTok. And we all know what happened to Vine.

[–] Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Why is Chinese tiktok different than that in the states then?

[–] AMDIsOurLord@lemmy.ml -5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Because the USA strong armed them into giving their platform handling to Oracle Corp, a top tier US govt contractor.

But since pro-palestine cries can't be silenced on TikTok as easily as Zio media, taking control of the platform is no longer enough

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

No, it's literally a different app in China.

[–] jumjummy@lemmy.world -4 points 7 months ago

You say “red scare” as if China isn’t a hostile nation state to the US. Go look at western company penetration in China if you want. Are you calling it “western scare” when China blocks yet another western company? I didn’t think so.

[–] exanime 11 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Hmm, here's what Zuckerberg said when he launched Facebook:

According to SAI sources, the following exchange is between a 19-year-old Mark Zuckerberg and a friend shortly after Mark launched The Facebook in his dorm room:

Zuck: Yeah so if you ever need info about anyone at Harvard

Zuck: Just ask.

Zuck: I have over 4,000 emails, pictures, addresses, SNS

[Redacted Friend's Name]: What? How'd you manage that one?

Zuck: People just submitted it.

Zuck: I don't know why.

Zuck: They "trust me"

Zuck: Dumb fucks.

Brutal.

Could Mark have been completely joking? Sure. But the exchange does reveal that Facebook's aggressive attitude toward privacy may have begun early on.

They may not be trying to control elections (they certainly have their fingers in that pie too), but they're still hostile to users.

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Why would it matter whether or not it's intentional, if the end effect is the same?

[–] Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

It's not the same. China wants to fuck up the American youth. That's why their version of tiktok is so different from ours. But you already knew that I'm sure

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 0 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Nah, I don't use tiktok, Chinese or otherwise so I wouldn't know the difference. But you're missing the point.

  • USA organisations abuse social media to spy on and influence citizens.
  • Chinese organisations abuse social media to spy on and influence citizens.

And yet, you claim one is inheritly worse than the other or should be preferered. To me, they are equally bad. If anything, the USA manipulation is worse - they can use that knowledge more easily and to greater effect than an attacker on the other side of the world.

[–] fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)
  • USA organisations abuse social media to spy on and influence citizens.
  • Chinese ~~organisations~~genocidal dictatorship abuse social media to spy on and influence citizens.
[–] Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Are the American companies doing it in pursuit of destabilizing the United States population for the betterment of the CCP and its interests?

Is the Chinese company doing it in pursuit of destabilizing the United States population for the betterment of the CCP and its interests?