this post was submitted on 03 May 2024
995 points (97.0% liked)

linuxmemes

21311 readers
507 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 139 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    Yes, they think their users will be confused by and accidentally remove extensions. To be fair that might happen sometimes but it's nowhere near worth it

    [–] marcos@lemmy.world 61 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    They already have a confirmation box when you try to change the extension. And could just as easily move it into another column where it's harder to change (explorer was like this once, a long time ago).

    And yet, they keep hiding the on the rationale that it confuses the users. The most common thing on explorer is some user being confused because they can't understand what clicking on a file is supposed to do, but that's not an argument for showing them...

    So, yeah, that's the surface-level explanation. But there's a deeper reason.

    [–] Almrond@lemmy.world 31 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    You seriously underestimate the stupidity of 80% of windows users. They could put multiple warnings and people would still click past them without reading then bitch to their IT team when they break something.

    [–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)
    [–] Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 6 months ago

    Gotta recycle this:

    [–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 months ago

    To be honest, it is the IT teams fault if they allow their users to click past those warnings with admin rights themselves.

    Now imagine those 80% of stupid Windows users on Linux.

    [–] AceSLS@ani.social 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    They already have a confirmation box when you try to change the extension

    I think you overestimate the average users willingness to read anything. Only thing they know is how to bitch about things not working even when they were told exactly why it's not working/what they did (wrong)

    [–] towerful@programming.dev 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    Classic ticket.
    "It's broken, it doesn't work",
    "what happened?",
    "I ran it like the instructions said, and it didn't do anything",
    "was there an error message?",
    "I don't know. Something popped up, but it was in the way so I closed it",
    "Do it again, don't close the error message, and tell me what it says"

    [–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 12 points 6 months ago

    Or my mom.

    Me: Don't just click OK without reading the message first.

    Mom: Don't click OK. Got it.

    [–] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 16 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

    Ah, right, in the context that Windows determines filetype only on extension.

    Btw, there's a bunch of mimeopen implementations for Linux. Is there something like that for Windows too?

    [–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago

    I don't think that anything like that exists in Windows. Generally that's my least issue with windows honestly. It's a POS on so many levels

    [–] potentiallynotfelix@lemmy.ml 12 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    Iirc there's a massive warning popping up saying it might fuck the file

    [–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago
    [–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    I don't think it even fucks the file, windows just can't open it until you put the file extension back.

    [–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 6 months ago

    That would be accurate. But it would fuck with your ability to open it by just double clicking it, which less savvy users would see as fucking the file.

    [–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

    Right. I'm saying even having that feature (in addition to the default setting of hiding the extension by default), is a bit too much