this post was submitted on 03 May 2024
890 points (98.8% liked)

News

23310 readers
3675 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 301 points 6 months ago (10 children)

We've turned into a nation of cowards. Just completely craven people who shoot first and ask questions later because the news has made them terrified that they'll be murdered in their beds, despite violent crime being historically low, comparatively speaking.

[–] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 115 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Having mingled with the gun community for some time, there are a lot of level-headed people among gun owners but there are also a worrying amount of terminally fearful people with violent ideation. Many are likely one bad life event, one half-cocked response to an uncertain situation from being a mugshot on a news story like this prick.

[–] blazera@lemmy.world 39 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Having mingled with the gun community for some time, there are a lot of level-headed people among gun owners

This is why US has so much gun violence. Like rabid dog owners assuring you theyre safe. You just havent seen them when theyre not level headed, we're all emotional apes.

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 35 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Yep. Even the "responsible" gun owners I know radiate the "I want you to know I'm dangerous" energy when they tell you how prepared they are, "just in case something happens that requires a gun"

There are other quieter owners you never really hear about though. My brother never really talks about it, doesn't chime in to water cooler "what are you shooting" kinds of talks, and basically just keeps them in the gun safe except for his ~2x a year gun range trips to make sure he stays competent.

He treats them like his garage full of dangerous power tools. Not a toy, but good to have in your back pocket should there be a need for that particular tool some day.

[–] blazera@lemmy.world 23 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I know most gun owners go their entire lives never shooting someone.

But i dont trust anyones judgment on who will or wont. Its not just the loud and proud gun enthusiasts that end up on the homicide news.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I know most gun owners go their entire lives never shooting someone.

But i dont trust anyones judgment on who will or wont.

Even the cops who aren't bastards could make the wrong assessment here, too.

It's safer to go unarmed so when the pros show up you don't become a concern for them for an instant.

[–] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

Cops who… aren’t bastards?

I don’t follow.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

He treats them like his garage full of dangerous power tools. Not a toy, but good to have in your back pocket should there be a need for that particular tool some day.

A significantly unfortunate number of gun owners treat them like fashion accessories. To be displayed, accessorized, collected, and carelessly treated.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago

Every gun owner is a responsible gun owner until they aren't.

[–] vividspecter@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

For the same reason, it makes spur of the moment suicide attempts more likely, and more deadly.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 9 points 6 months ago

there are a lot of level-headed people among gun owners but there are also a worrying amount of terminally fearful people with violent ideation.

The problem is that both groups have the same ease of access to weapons.

Until there are a lot more reliable ways to tell the 2 groups apart, weapons need to be a lot more difficult to get your hands on.

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 47 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Yeah. I have friends that won't even let their kids walk a quarter mile to school, in one of the safest communities in the entire state. It's insane. The media has put the fear of "but what if..." into so many people.

You've got better odds winning the lottery than what these people are afraid of. Be smart, be savvy, be aware of your surroundings and watch out for the oblivions as you go about your business. But there's no need to be afraid of everything around you.

[–] asteriskeverything@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago (2 children)

In that situation I'm concerned about other drivers, and also the child not paying attention while staring at their phone. I have seen sooo many teens just step off the curb and walk across the street without even looking up from their phone. Stranger Danger would have nothing to do with it.

There needs to be a better balance between the latch key kid independence/responsibility and the absolute lack of trust in your kids and your community to just not be child kidnapping murderers???

[–] vividspecter@lemm.ee 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Fixing transport infrastructure would have the most impact. Narrower roads with fewer lanes and more complexity, 20mph/30kmph speed limits, better designed pedestrian crossings, and separated bike and pedestrian infrastructure. And requiring the vehicles themselves to be designed such that they are not just safe for the occupants, but safe for other vehicles and people too (which means lower hood heights and lower weight).

And in general, providing viable alternatives to driving so there are less vehicles on the road, making it safer to walk and bike.

[–] daltotron@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

but safe for other vehicles and people too (which means lower hood heights and lower weight).

Small note on this, but better crash compatibility and an upper weight limit might also increase the relative safety of bicycles, motorcycles, and even potentially some larger local wildlife, on top of just increasing safety for pedestrians and people driving relatively smaller cars, like sedans.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

The whole way our society is built is not around pedestrian safety or teaching it to children.

My daughter is growing up in a subdivision with low traffic and no sidewalks and I have to regularly remind her to look both ways when crossing the streets when we're elsewhere because it's just not something she has to do all the time.

There's room for sidewalks, they just didn't build them. If there were sidewalks, it would be far easier for her to remember to do it every time.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

You’ve got better odds winning the lottery than what these people are afraid of. Be smart, be savvy, be aware of your surroundings and watch out for the oblivions as you go about your business. But there’s no need to be afraid of everything around you.

Awareness prevents the vast majority of dangerous situations. Carrying is actually more likely to escalate situations into being dangerous than not. even a basic situational awareness will keep you far safer than a fire arm ever will.

[–] bufordt@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I agree that people shouldn't be afraid of this stuff, but I think you underestimate the odds of winning the lottery and your chances of being murdered.

Around 32,000 homicides/year in the US. 333,000,000 people, so about 1 in 100,000.

Powerball odds are 1 in 292,000,000.

[–] nonfuinoncuro@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

the distribution is different though, if you buy a powerball ticket you have the same odds as everyone else who bought one assuming the numbers are equally distributed and truly random

the difference between living in Biden's suburban neighborhood in Delaware vs west Philly or Baltimore is huge

[–] bufordt@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Sure, but nowhere is the chance of winning the lottery greater than the chance of getting murdered. Even Singapore, which has the lowest homicide rate, is around 1 in 1,000,000.

I suppose if you classified getting a playback prize on a scratch off as a lottery win, but I doubt most people count that.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 37 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Everything is a threat. Thank you Faux News and the rest.

Different color skin - threat

Gay - threat

Trans - threat

Environmental rules - threat

Immigration - thread

Vegetarian - threat

Equality - threat

Atheism - threat

Non-western religion - threat

Woke - threat

Electric cars - threat

The list is endless. Everything is a threat to them. Their pocketbooks, their marriage, their jobs, their theism, their TV, their guns…

An endless barrage of threats that they are constantly reminded of.

What can they do against all these threats? Elect a Strong Man that will crack skulls, He Has All The Answers. But those pesky libs keep getting in the way, so you gotta take matters into your own hands. Thank god and the good ol’ USA you can have a personal arsenal at arm’s reach to instantly panic-fire at that dark-skinned person pulling into your driveway who wants to steal your TV.

[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world 34 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The "I feared for my life" rhetoric is just an excuse to shoot people, borrowed from police when they wanted to shoot people. You don't have to politely believe them just because they said it.

Yeah this was just a car in the driveway right ? No one is fearing for their life over that.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago

Violent crime being historically low except for idiots who shoot at people for turning around in their driveway, ringing the wrong doorbell, etc...

[–] brygphilomena@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

I've talked about in in several other posts regarding gun control.

The rampant media sowing fear is poison. It's the culture that's being fostered that's more dangerous than the guns. "Fuck around and find out" and "come try and take them" keeps reinforcing that guns are a totally normal thing to use to solve problems.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The NRA fear paranoia narrative has permeated our society. Add to that those who feel inferior so they carry a gun to feel powerful. Now add the hate farming by Russian trolls and right wing media, (the two are the same, with different names)

[–] JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee 4 points 6 months ago

How often I witness roadrage/aggressive drivers makes the mass gunownership in this country kind of terrifying. I've seen a truck try to push another car off the road for getting off a left hand exit. I can only assume the truck driver was mad at the car for "being in the way." The power tripping and entitlement to being aggressive towards others combined with your list of problematic cultural phenomenon and guns is horrifying.

[–] asteriskeverything@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

I saw an ad for a news app that literally said "fear watch"

So you can always be on top of what to be afraid of next!

[–] Nobody@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

You’re right that the vast majority are cowards, but you also have psychos who jerk off to a fantasy of shooting someone. There are all kinds of crazies out there just looking for a reason, and they’re getting crazier in their psycho echo chambers.