176
Donald Trump demands Jack Smith be arrested after document revelation
(www.newsweek.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 04 May 2024
176 points (91.1% liked)
politics
18075 readers
2805 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
It has no bearing on the case. The fuck you on about?
People who are intimately involved have a tendency to make compromised decisions involving the other person. It isn't just about doing the right thing, it is about looking like you are doing the right thing too.
He was already removed. So again, it had no bearing on the case.
As far as we know. That doesn’t mean it won’t have a bearing on an appeal or anything else that might happen. Glad you clearly know all and the future though.
It clearly doesn't lol but you keep thinking that.
https://apnews.com/article/31ca3234b244126cbe412dc279fd0562
Look at that. Still having an impact. You are incorrect.
Doesn't mean she'll be kicked off dumbass.
I never stated that. And clear you are losing the argument as you are resorting to name calling.
Lol it doesn't but whatever helps you sleep at night.
You are obviously not taking input, why participate?
Wtf is that even supposed to mean?
I can repeat it if you like...
Even if they don't have sex, people who work closely together inevitably become intimate.
Judgement can be clouded for all kinds of reasons. That's also unavoidable in any complex undertaking without rising to the level of malfeasance or negligence.
Yes. So in such a high profile case. Why? That’s idiotic.
They stopped having sex before the indictment. What's idiotic is people thinking that two people who ever had sex before shouldn't work together.
It clouds the judgment of their character. That gives trump an opening… aka dumb AF on their part.