this post was submitted on 04 May 2024
59 points (100.0% liked)
askchapo
22846 readers
117 users here now
Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.
Rules:
-
Posts must ask a question.
-
If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.
-
Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.
-
Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
i hear this point all the time, but spears are honestly a compromise based on logistics, useful for an army or mass formation (harder to stab ur own guys when the sharp bits are 4 or more feet away) but for a 1 on 1 or other small fight why not use a greatsword if price is no issue? with a smaller spear you can use a shield, but if its pike v greatsword, well theres a reason the more elite that guarded the battle standards or disrupted pike formations had greatswords instead of spears - a greatsword is just a better more expensive spear in many ways. Plus i just cant get ENOUGH parierhaken (hooky bits like a secondary hilt halfway down the blade), if more spears had secondary hilt-style bits for grappling i'd be closer to team spear lol.
but yeah in a contest between the spear and the standard 1 handed sword, spear is the way to go, shield or not