this post was submitted on 09 May 2024
755 points (97.1% liked)

World News

39102 readers
3960 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

"I expect a semi-dystopian future with substantial pain and suffering for the people of the Global South," one expert said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Someone will. We will. Our current trajectory is unsustainable.

[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It’s only unsustainable if you want everyone to survive. Too many people are quietly okay with losing a few billion strangers due to their certainty they’ll be fine.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

That's what I said a good 25 years ago when I learned about climate change. It went through a bunch of name changes, there have been multiple world meetings about it to see how much further we could push it up to sustain "our economies" and the few little suggestions that came out of that were completely ignored so that we could have the next world economic forum or whatever.

If any politician would actually do something REAL, I'd support it. I have not seen anything beyond "well let's try to change cars to electrical over a 20 year period but also dump nuclear power so effectively all electrical cars still run coal". We. Need. To. Stop. Using. Cars. Car use needs to drop by 95%, THAT would make a difference. Start converting 90% of car infrastructure to park, bicycle infrastructure and public transportation like trains and busses. Convert cargo trucks to electrical, start investing like crazy in nuclear power plants. Push companies to either let employees work from home or pay tripple tax. Tax the shit out of anyone earning more than 10 times the average. Start adding sulfur solutions to kerosine so that airplanes can start spewing it in the atmosphere to lower temperatures... Any of those are solutions, I haven't seen any of it.

Nobody is going to do anything because politicians are dumb egocentric assholes that only care about their own reelection.

We're fucked in the next 30 years or so

If Trump gets elected, we'll be fucked within 10. I'm honestly thinking at this point that maybe we should just all vote for trump. Get it over with, kill this world, humanity is a failed experiment.

[–] set_secret@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Stopping meat eating would have a bigger impact on climate change than removing cars, and that's doable for everyone. Also EV cars do reduce the co2, and as grids get cleaner cars do too. Additionally many put solar on their houses to charge Evs.

Whist i agree car numbers should definitely be reduced, people should work from home far more for example, but meat is a greater problem that we could all address immediately without dismantling infrastructure.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, the "stop eating meat is doable" is not doable. Ppeoli simply won't do it. What you can (should) do is increase taxes on meat. If meat becomes twice as expensive, people will eat it less. Use the extra tax income to subsidize meat alternatives, make those more attractive.

We can do with a LOT less cars if we wanted to. Same as with meat, we don't want it. Still, most car rides are under 3 miles, which can easily be done by bike but good luck being the politician pushing bikes. Or increased taxes on meat.

[–] set_secret@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No reason we cant do all of these things. Taxing meat is a geat idea too.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

There is a big reason we can't do any of that.

The general public is dumb, and politicians happily watch the world burn if they can rule the ashes.

Because of that, no politician will ever push for any of that.

[–] set_secret@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Sadly you are probably correct here too

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

I went through an accelerationist adjacent phase a few years ago, then I realized that what I was accelerating towards would happen regardless. From a utilitarian perspective, I don’t know which path mitigates more human deaths.