this post was submitted on 11 May 2024
427 points (96.9% liked)

News

23615 readers
3343 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/15286301

"A group of Republican lawmakers introduced a bill on Wednesday which would send “any person convicted of unlawful activity” at a college or university, to do community service in Gaza for six months."

"Strangely, the bill appears to refer to any “unlawful activity on the campus of an institution of higher education beginning on and after October 7, 2023” but does not specifically mention the ongoing student protests, rendering it stupidly broad."

"Ogles spoke with Fox News about the bill, saying that, “If you support a terrorist organization, and you participate in unlawful activity on campuses, you should get a taste of your own medicine. I am going to bet that these pro-Hamas supporters wouldn’t last a day, but let’s give them the opportunity.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 70 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (5 children)

I mean, they probably know there's no chance in hell of that bill gaining traction let alone passing (for so many reasons ‡). It's all performance / pandering to their base in an election year.

The scary takeaway should be that's what the Republican base wants to hear.

‡ The fact that you can't just "deport" a citizen to a random country is the least of the things logically wrong with this bill.

[–] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 38 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Can we get a bill started that says if you support any war, you have to be enlisted to fight on the front lines of it?

I stand by the fact that there would be way fewer warhawks if they had to put their money where there mouths are.

Cowardsw

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 11 points 7 months ago

Yeah, that one I could get behind.

100% of the population must vote to go to war or not.

Everyone is notified beforehand that a vote of Yes is also immediate enlistment into the military for the duration of said conflict.

No more shouting "hell yeah turn the middle east into a parking lot" from the comfort of your armchair or lifted pickup.

[–] Fermion@mander.xyz 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That would be great if we could get most governments to pass the same rule. If adversarial governments aren't restricted by the same rules then it tips the power balance in a way that favors foreign warhawks.

[–] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I feel like enough people would be willing to step up and defend their own country.

Defensive wars almost always have high approval ratings.

This is America though, we will end up tearing ourselves apart from the inside, no outside entity has the power to wage wars over an ocean to invade us.

We are naturally in one of the most defensible spots, with both mineral and arable resources

I'll 100% grab a rifle to help defend my neck of the woods, but no way in hell am I supporting an offensive war.

Never Again Volunteer Yourself, but in a defensive war it's no longer capitalism and the military industrial complex you're "defending", it's your neighbors.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It'd be nice if they stopped wasting money on things that they knew were unconstitutional though.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 3 points 7 months ago

"Arooo, that may be so. But I know a place where the Constitution doesn't mean squat!"

[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I think we should always take these bills as serious attempts to accomplish what they say. Anything else gives them cover, like:

https://piped.video/watch?v=VYHGnsOwHvI

[–] Bipta@kbin.social 4 points 7 months ago

Next year they could pass this and the Supreme Court could approve it. Imagine still believing in guardrails...

[–] randompasta 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Just wait until next year. I wonder if you're post will seem silly or prophetic.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 6 points 7 months ago

As with any statement I make when I make fun of Republicans, I sincerely hope it turns out to be silly.

[–] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

The left need to stop being scared of guns, stop voting for useless gun control measures that only restrict control in their own district and do nothing to reduce crime (meanwhile right wing districts allow you to buy an arsenal of nice ergonomic firearms that can allow even a morbidly obese diabetic to accurately shoot the dick off a fly, delivered to your front door like Amazon), start forming left wing LGBTQIA+ friendly militias and train to protect themselves.

We can do that, or hope the boot lickers and cops don't persecute us. Which is the same as sending hopes and prayers on Facebook.

[–] ceiphas@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

How can anybody believe that more guns is the only possible solution for everything?

If your only tool is a hammer, every screw starts to look like a nail.

[–] NobodyElse@sh.itjust.works 9 points 7 months ago

It’s another tool for the toolbox. How can being more prepared with a more diverse set of tools be bad for any situation? Right now the only tool seems to be posting outraged comments on the internet.

[–] Alto@kbin.social 7 points 7 months ago

Ding ding ding. Authoritarian governments never disarm the right. The police have shown that they won't protect you, if they're not actively joining in on it.

We protect us.