this post was submitted on 10 May 2024
1280 points (98.0% liked)

linuxmemes

20846 readers
2273 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

But that delay in opening is only for the very first time after installation, it does not affect any subsequent app starts, even after you reboot. In real world performance, snaps are basically just as fast as any normal app in my experience. And you need to keep in mind what the idea behind ubuntu is - they want it to be useful to experienced users as well as newbies and tech-illiterates. Snap automatic updates are honestly really nice if you don't want to think about updates and canonical have done a lot of work to make the experience as smooth as possible, and the sandbox is a nice bit of added security. They are very versatile too, allowing any type of software to be a snap, from little terminal tools to full-featured nextcloud instances

[–] kurcatovium@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Not OP, but... the reason why I won't use Ubuntu is that whole snap thing. I'm not hating on snaps in general (although I prefer flatpak), but I hate what Ubuntu does with them. You apt install firefox and yet it still ignores your command and do whatever it feels like doing. Why? Why not leave both options available while maybe prefering snaps for inexperienced users (I mean like gui store default to snap)? This is just one thing now, but what might be next? This smells whole lot like Microsoft approach (light version). And I don't like this direction.

[–] ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I get that, they shouldn't replace debs with snaps, but offer both. Snap as default makes sense for new users though

[–] kurcatovium@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago

Yes, that's why I said gui store might default to snap because that's what new users are using. But when you explicitly put command to terminal and it still ignores it? That's not what I expected when I jumped MS ship...

[–] tomkatt@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

That delay happens on first launch every boot. Also the automatic updates happening basically whenever is nonsense. It should tell me an update is needed, not just kick it off whenever it feels like. That kind of crap is why I use Linux and not Windows, and now why I don’t use Ubuntu.

[–] Zacryon@lemmy.wtf 3 points 4 months ago

Strange. Never had automatic updates on Ubuntu. Just notifications that there are some. Also I don't have similar issues with Firefox. Works perfectly fine for me.

[–] ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They fixed the delay after reboots and you can disable automatic updates with a single snap command

[–] tomkatt@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Too little too late. They lost what goodwill they might have had with me. I dealt with that for months until I decided to flip it. I won't be using Ubuntu in the future unless for some awful reason I specifically need an Ubuntu server (and in that case I'd still push for Almalinux or another alternative).

[–] ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

That's fine, use whatever you like. I'm just saying that current ubuntu is quite polished.