742
submitted 1 month ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Kevin Roberts remembers when he could get a bacon cheeseburger, fries and a drink from Five Guys for $10. But that was years ago. When the Virginia high school teacher recently visited the fast-food chain, the food alone without a beverage cost double that amount.

Roberts, 38, now only gets fast food "as a rare treat," he told CBS MoneyWatch. "Nothing has made me cook at home more than fast-food prices."

Roberts is hardly alone. Many consumers are expressing frustration at the surge in fast-food prices, which are starting to scare off budget-conscious customers.

A January poll by consulting firm Revenue Management Solutions found that about 25% of people who make under $50,000 were cutting back on fast food, pointing to cost as a concern.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] foggy@lemmy.world 63 points 1 month ago

Hey McDonald's.

This isn't reddit so you probably won't see this.

Hashbrowns cost $1. Figure it out. Not here to haggle.

Also can someone sue these MFS giving deals through apps? Like "sorry homeless guy pan-handling out front, medium fry is only free if you have a $200 phone! Sucks to suck." How is that ok?

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 9 points 1 month ago

Jack in the Box still has 2 tacos for $0.99... if you order through the app. If you don't use the app, they're over $2. Those tacos aren't worth it.

[-] IamAnonymous@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Hashbrowns from McD is $2.19 here lol. I stopped buying them long time ago.

[-] Liz@midwest.social 6 points 1 month ago

I have vague memories of there being a law that you're supposed to just be able to ask the cashier to apply any discounts you know about at the cash register?

[-] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This is absolutely not real. I mean just think about it for a second.

[-] Liz@midwest.social 5 points 1 month ago

I thought about it for a second, and could see it being an accessibility law passed for this very type of thing. Kind of like how (in the US) you must always be able to join a sweepstakes without paying any money (usually you mail them your name and address) even if the way they want you to join us by buying product or something. But anyway, I don't actually know about that coupon thing.

[-] Archer@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Accountability? In the US? For corporations? Favoring people??

[-] jj4211@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

The "No Purchase Necessary" isn't about giving everyone fair access to the winnings, it's about being legal even where gambling is not, since "maybe winning" something in exchange for money is either illegal or highly regulated throughout the US.

[-] Liz@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago

Ah, I didn't know! Thanks for the info.

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

There is a law in the US that any x for y deal must be sold at the ratio unit price.

So like "10 for $10!" Means they are breaking the law to sell them at a price more than $1 for 1.

The caveat is packaging. E.G. Marlboro can wrap two packs of cigarettes and call it a Buy One Get One deal which is not the same. Weird little loopholes.

[-] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Hash browns used to be $.90 ea or 2 for $1.

this post was submitted on 12 May 2024
742 points (98.3% liked)

News

21700 readers
3265 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS