this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
358 points (94.8% liked)

World News

39110 readers
2510 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's sweden, if you pick locations randomly, chances are on your side that it'll be insanely remote.

[–] csolisr@communities.azkware.net 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good to know! That means plenty of places that could be cordoned off in case of a Fukushima, right?

[–] Sethayy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tell me you know nothing about nuclear science without telling me

(Simpsons doesn't count as a credible source)

[–] csolisr@communities.azkware.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm surprised to see so many people eagerly dismissing the chance of a nuclear reactor leak, even by accident.

[–] Sethayy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And what are those chances may I ask?

Its like comparing a 1970's shitbox car to a 2022 model and saying all cars are immediately gonna kill us.

Really don't think any nuclear reactor leaks are not accidents, hence why we have such amazing tech to stop it

[–] schroedingershat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Chances of a leak are roughly 100%

Most sites are unusable for a few decades due to tritium leaks.

Chances of an economy-destroying disaster on the other hand are much lower, but you didn't ask that.

[–] Sethayy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Odds of a leak are what?? Give me some of whatever youre smoking, unless you mean some backass "technically they leak runoff water" bs, cause reactors are currently the safest way to generate power, even beating the insanely small dangers of solar (which due to production requires more overall human risk)

[–] schroedingershat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Chances of an economy-destroying disaster on the other hand are much lower, but you didn’t ask that.

Also now you're lying again with that second sentence. For no benefit whatsoever, as well. This is also a 100% consistent pattern with nuke shills.