this post was submitted on 17 May 2024
112 points (99.1% liked)

news

23397 readers
806 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

These and other measures announced Friday marked Beijing's latest efforts to address issues in the massive real estate sector.

The People's Bank of China will provide 300 billion yuan ($42.25 billion) to financial institutions to lend to local state-owned enterprises (SOEs) so they can buy unsold apartments that have already been built.

Also Friday, the PBOC removed a floor on mortgage interest rates, and lowered the minimum down payment ratio for first- and second-time home buyers.

BEIJING — Chinese authorities on Friday pledged new support for state-owned enterprises to enable them to buy unsold apartments, in an effort that could help developers get more funding to finish construction on pre-sold properties.

These and other measures announced Friday marked Beijing's latest efforts to address issues in the massive real estate sector.

"I think it is encouraging that the policy is taking a turn of direction trying to support the housing market," said Zhu Ning, a professor of finance at Tsinghua University and author of the book "China's Guaranteed Bubble."

People's Bank of China Deputy Governor Tao Ling told reporters at a briefing Friday the central bank would provide 300 billion yuan ($42.25 billion) to financial institutions to lend to local state-owned enterprises (SOEs) so they can buy unsold apartments that have already been built.

The central bank expects the support to release 500 billion yuan in financing for such purchases, which the SOEs could turn into affordable housing.

The real estate companies can then use funds earned from those sales to complete construction on other apartments, the central bank said.

As for unfinished, pre-sold properties, the National Financial Regulatory Administration Deputy Director Xiao Yuanqi told reporters that commercial banks have provided 935 billion yuan in loans to finish construction on whitelisted projects since the program was released in January.

"The government's purchase of housing inventory can inject more liquidity to developers, who could then have more resources for housing delivery," Larry Hu, chief economist at Macquarie, told CNBC. "Finally the government stepped in as the buyer of the last resort."

"At this stage, it's mainly SOEs and local governments to implement the policies, but their resources may be too limited to move the needle at the macro level," he said. "Later on, we might see more efforts from the central government."

Developers "that must go bankrupt should go bankrupt, while those that need to be restructured should be restructured," Dong Jianguo, deputy head of the ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development, told reporters in Mandarin, translated by CNBC. He said homebuyers' interests and rights should be prioritized, and those that violate the law should be punished.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rx_Hawk@hexbear.net 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Are they just building to provide jobs and push the economy along?

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

That could be the case, but within the context of this article there's no discussion of building new units. This is about the government purchasing unsold units from the real estate companies.

[–] LesbianLiberty@hexbear.net 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

foucault-madness this is just like when millions were forced to default on their loans and be kicked out of their homes, 1984 communism no iPhone, the evil CCP is lowering the price of housing

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

the evil CCP is lowering the price of housing

Based on what? there's no discussion here of the housing prices being lowered, only of the government purchasing unsold units from real estate companies. At no point is there any indication that the government will provide those units to buyers at lower prices.

[–] Rx_Hawk@hexbear.net 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think we’re all operating under the assumption that would be a communist government’s end goal

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

If it were communist the government would be providing housing to the people at no cost. There's no indication of that either.

Has this government actually taken any such action?

[–] What_Religion_R_They@hexbear.net 12 points 3 months ago

If it were communist the government would be providing housing to the people at no cost

who said. is china classless and moneyless

[–] LesbianLiberty@hexbear.net 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Communism is when I have a utopia realized immediately with no regards for the cost, material conditions buildup required, or the context in which a revolution took place ☝️🤓

Shut the fuck up cracker

It's a communist party running and maintaining an imperfect and very real society. China's existence as a state, building towards socialism notably, has been defined by this required buildup because amerikkka france-cool ukkk emmiserated the shit out of China and it's people. All socialists have admitted that socialism is merely the goal, a society of pure working class and peasant control in both politics and the economy, but recognize that it will require a rich and advanced economy both to improve the lives of many and to allow them to participate in it's institutions as fully as socialism requires. Just because you're from a nation that doesn't even understand what a liberal is, let alone a communist, doesn't mean that the Communist Party of China (a communist party with more than 98 million members) is so naive.

If you're clearly so intelligent and able to dictate what the Chinese people should do you should focus on fixing the United States first, as it's currently committing a genocide. I think that takes far more priority than red bashing at the moment.

[–] geikei@hexbear.net 7 points 3 months ago

Chinese state taking a larger and larger role in the housing sector and various public affortable housing initiatives in various levels and models have been openly and officialy stated by the CPC as actions to be taken going forward. Most western coverages even of sales like the one we are talking about specificaly mention them being part of those policies

[–] LesbianLiberty@hexbear.net 3 points 3 months ago

I have many friends who are Chinese and they're still salty that the price of housing was lowered because many Chinese people used housing as an investment in the past. Beyond all this heady discussion, that's the only real effect this has had on the vast majority of homeowners in China (who are themselves the vast majority of people)

[–] geikei@hexbear.net 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The government would need to spend more money, dept and productive capital and manpower to built the equivalent amount of units compared to what they buy from developers now. Also a lot of these are unfinished in various degrees too so in part jobs and construction under state hands or supervision will continue for those units for a productive end result

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 1 points 3 months ago

The government would need to spend more money, dept and productive capital and manpower to built the equivalent amount of units compared to what they buy from developers now.

Sure, but that doesn't mean the government will be providing the purchased units to people at lower cost.

Also a lot of these are unfinished in various degrees too so in part jobs and construction under state hands or supervision will continue for those units for a productive end result

This is a separate issue, as per the article:

As for unfinished, pre-sold properties, the National Financial Regulatory Administration Deputy Director Xiao Yuanqi told reporters that commercial banks have provided 935 billion yuan in loans to finish construction on whitelisted projects since the program was released in January.

Loans for completing unfinished properties are coming from commercial banks, which is different from the money that PBOC is loaning to the SOEs to purchase unsold units from the real estate companies.