this post was submitted on 26 May 2024
399 points (97.6% liked)

politics

18883 readers
3657 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FiniteBanjo 10 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I wish this was cause for hope, but polls are still showing Trump neck and neck usually with a 2% lead over Biden. It's really going to come down to at least two, probably three, swing states. Given that some of them allow the EC vote to be split, there is even a possibility of a Tie.

[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The last couple of elections have shown the polls to be unreliable with a distinct bias favoring Republicans in appearance. Last I heard the popular theory was boomers are more likely to answer random calls and have time for a bunch of questions.

[–] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No. The polls do swing about 4% but it’s in a random direction in every election no matter what.

Almost no polls use landline random digit dialing exclusively anymore. Some call cell phones, some do online surveys or in person surveys, and some do focus groups.

Almost no polls use landline [...] Some call cell phones

Yes; that's entirely consistent with what I said. I wasn't even considering that some polls might be calling landlines when I made my comment.

[–] FiniteBanjo 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Okay but the Trump "victory" of 2016 was shocking to most analysts.

[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm talking about data within the past 4 years. 2016 was 8 years ago.

[–] FiniteBanjo -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Right so the last 3 elections but not the election 4 ago specifically, okay.

[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)
  1. The last 2 elections. If you're going to criticize me at least take the time to double-check your math.
[–] FiniteBanjo -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Not even going to include midterm elections for Congress?

[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Including the midterm election is how I got a grand total of 2.

1 presidential 4 years ago.

1 midterm 2 years ago.

1+1=2.

2 elections.

Get it yet?

Please consider taking the time to think instead of immediately jumping to a knee-jerk response.

[–] FiniteBanjo 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Ah you right, you said 4 years but I kept going with the 8 years line of thinking.

It's late for me, so I get it. Sorry for the condescending tone I took at the end.

[–] HANN@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Whatever happens will happen. We don't have control over the outcome only our efforts. Do what you can now to fight for what you believe. Stressing over polls doesn't help.

[–] FiniteBanjo 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The best possible choices come from having access to all possible information.

[–] HANN@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Sure, about the candidates and their stances. All the candidates manipulate the polls to make it look like their ahead and they are just used to pressure people to vote for one of the major parties. Vote for who you want in office. And if you are inclined then try to sway others. But this bandwagon appeal isn't the way.

[–] FiniteBanjo -4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

How long does your little segway take to get to the part about the lizard people?

[–] HANN@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There is no need for personal attacks. If you are implying I subscribe to conspiracy theories then you are not correct.

[–] FiniteBanjo -2 points 3 months ago

No no, not conspiracy theories, just that the candidates respectively each own the media as a whole and that all polls are made up numbers.

[–] ashok36@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

If trump internal polling showed the same lead, there's no way he would show up to try to eat away a slice of the libertarians puny 2-3% of the vote.

I think the numbers look way worse for Trump than national pollsters show and I think their polling indicates Trump loses in a landslide if he's convicted in any of his cases.

[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

That it should require a conviction is still batshit insane. That's still way too damning of a good portion of the American public.

[–] FiniteBanjo 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

TBF, A or B Polling won't show any votes for C, but with how third party is more popular than in the past for both major parties this year in the wake of the Gaza Genocide it could negatively impact either candidate. That doesn't mean the polling is meaningless.

Trump is polling with a lead even as closing arguments are heard in his hush money trial today, and he has suspended his ~~insurrection~~ classified documents criminal trial indefinitely with help from a Judge Cannon that he appointed during his term.

We don't have to like it but we have to accept the facts here, Trump is popular and that threatens the future of US Democracy and NATO.

EDIT: His insurrection trials are held up over some other BS.

[–] ashok36@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Slight correction: the insurrection case is held up by the Supreme Court sitting on their hands. The classified document case is held up by Cannon.

[–] FiniteBanjo 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No, it had a date set for May 20th and Judge Cannon postponed it with no new date set. She made the decision on May 7th, less than 2 weeks before the trial.

Trump's criminal insurrection trial would have already started if Cannon didn't postpone it.

[–] ashok36@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No, the insurrection trial is held up by the scotus. It always would have been, with or without Cannon.

[–] FiniteBanjo 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The Trial

Would Be

Happening Right Now

Unless Judge Cannon Postponed It

[–] ashok36@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Cannon isn't in charge of the insurrection challenge.

[–] FiniteBanjo 1 points 3 months ago

Ah you're right, it's his other other criminal trial, the classified documents hoarded at Mara Lago. It's kind of hard to keep track of his felonies at this rate.