Unpopular Opinion

6325 readers

10 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!

How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.

If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.

Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)

If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].

Rules:

1. NO POLITICS

Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.

2. Be civil.

Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...

Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.

5. No trolling.

This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Rooki@lemmy.world

JonsJava@lemmy.world

admiralpatrick@lemmy.world

lemann@lemmy.world

ptz@dubvee.org

-21

Age caps on political office are a bad idea (lemmy.ml)

submitted 5 months ago by frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml to c/unpopularopinion@lemmy.world

30 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Blunt tools shouldn't be used for complex real-world things. Other examples would be mandatory sentencing in courts (you should let the judge assess the particular situation), or things like "I don't go out with guys under 160cm" (you should get to know him).

Just because someone is in their 70s, doesn't mean they can't lead. Not with any certainty. In some cases it does, but the political process should have the flexibility to deal with each case.

Look at Deng: he was mid-70s to mid-80s when he was in power and he improved the lives of 10⁸ or 10⁹ people.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

From his wiki article.

Furthermore, he is associated with some of the worst purges during Mao Zedong's rule; for instance, he ordered an army crackdown on a Muslim village in Yunnan which resulted in the deaths of 1,600 people, including 300 children.

It seems like killing a whole village is a pretty blunt tool.

Edit spelling

[–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

burnt tool

😁 good un!

[–] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Is that all you have, judging a spelling error? Only a weak argument relies on pettiness. If you believe in him so much how about you comment on his well documented crimes? Or do you have nothing to say?

[–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

oh I thought you were punning.

Please don't be grumpy. It's a summertime Saturday.

If you believe in him so much how about you comment on his well documented crimes?

I didn't say I "believe in Deng so much". I wouldn't be the sort of person who goes around hero-worshipping politicians. What I said was he improved the lives of a billion-or-so people. You have provided no evidence that is untrue.

Is that all you have, judging a spelling error? Only a weak argument relies on pettiness..... Or do you have nothing to say?

You're coming across like one of those people who argues on the internet.

[–] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The lady doth protest too much, methinks

[–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 months ago