Microblog Memes

5801 readers

2336 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
Be nice.
No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

ReadyUser31@lemmy.world

aeronmelon@lemmy.world

1252

All possible permutations (i.imgur.com)

submitted 5 months ago by poplargrove@lemmy.world to c/microblogmemes@lemmy.world

80 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] RadicalEagle@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I guess I don't think I see how that contradicts the initial post, but maybe that's just because I'm reading the post as saying the same thing as "leave enough hydrogen alone for long enough and eventually it starts thinking"

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Well, it's more that observing that the allegory is based in reality ... is quite literally turning it on its head. Saying, "but it's tru tho" is a thought-terminating statement that ignores the entire reason WHY it is a valid allegory.

It is a valid allegory specifically because the monkeys didn't intend to write a play. Shakespear wanted to write a play. The monkeys did not. It is a fundamental detail for the allegory to even work.

[–] RadicalEagle@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Gotcha gotcha. In other words: us being monkeys generating random output is an unfalsifiable hypothesis, so saying "it's true" is unscientific. Yes, it could be true if free will didn't exist, but since that's not something that can be proven we shouldn't use it as the basis for how we view reality. Something like that?

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I mean, yea that works if you want to continue to carry it in that direction, but my point is... The expression is not commenting on humans what so ever. It's commenting on the the law of averages vs the law of large numbers. The probability is not zero, so eventually, even seemingly impossible things WILL occur, and that it's NOT some mystic sign if something rare does happen.