this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2024
41 points (88.7% liked)

PC Gaming

8524 readers
818 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DumbAceDragon@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (5 children)

AI+

Absolutely not. This thing is going to perform horribly because half the processor die is dedicated to something nobody's gonna use.

If this were a business laptop then I'd understand adding AI. But this is a gaming handheld, how the hell will this help?

[–] Codilingus@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago (3 children)

It has an NPU, so should see no performance loss from AI. The opposite is probably true, it'll be fast at AI and more efficient.

[–] ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

The silicon needed for the npu causes the price to be higher than it needs to be

[–] cabb@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This is taking a laptop CPU and stuffing it in a handheld. The laptop CPU already has the npu and removing it would require a new SKU which would cost money for special handling for packaging, new firmware, new drivers, and probably more costs I haven't considered. You would save on the silicon but unless they have high volume, removing the npu is likely more expensive.

load more comments (1 replies)