this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2024
41 points (88.7% liked)

PC Gaming

8250 readers
542 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Curious to see some benchmarks

[–] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago

Why? They’ll all be synthetic dogshit from a company known to never tell the truth in any benchmark.

[–] DumbAceDragon@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

AI+

Absolutely not. This thing is going to perform horribly because half the processor die is dedicated to something nobody's gonna use.

If this were a business laptop then I'd understand adding AI. But this is a gaming handheld, how the hell will this help?

[–] Codilingus@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It has an NPU, so should see no performance loss from AI. The opposite is probably true, it'll be fast at AI and more efficient.

[–] ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The silicon needed for the npu causes the price to be higher than it needs to be

[–] cabb@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This is taking a laptop CPU and stuffing it in a handheld. The laptop CPU already has the npu and removing it would require a new SKU which would cost money for special handling for packaging, new firmware, new drivers, and probably more costs I haven't considered. You would save on the silicon but unless they have high volume, removing the npu is likely more expensive.

[–] ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Fair point.

[–] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago

They will likely try to leverage AI to reduce rendering like AMD. I suspect this is literally announced to show that Intel is still relevant and to prevent more bleeding from that company. They did similar when Apple dropped them. Rather than make better chips, they released a mass marketing push to show they were every bit as good as Apple silicon if not better.

[–] SuperSaiyanSwag@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I love my steam deck and I doubt I would be replacing it any time soon, but if someone comes up with something with a more appealing form factor, like something that can fit in my pocket then I’m sold. It doesn’t need to be super graphics intensive, just needs to be able to play some easy to pickup-and-play games like stardew and slay the spire.

[–] Assman@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You're literally describing a cell phone which can play both of the games you mentioned

[–] SuperSaiyanSwag@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 months ago

That is my fault for not being specific. I want SteamOS or Steam support.

[–] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago

Intel isn’t going to be the one to pioneer, well, anything.

Who is this for? I will never buy a product with AI in it's name