this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2024
619 points (97.7% liked)

Political Memes

5452 readers
2788 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Note: fully aware of the irony of this gif, not to mention the wild contrast between the book and film. That being said, the movie is better.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Just for the record the movie was definitely not the same as the book- Heinlein himself was libertarian, though I wouldn’t say it comes across in the book.

(The book setting is definitely fascist, or at the least authoritarian;)

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Heinlein himself was ~~libertarian~~ fascist.

FTFY.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Let me rephrase- heinlein identified himself as libertarian.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago
[–] Banana@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Wasn't the movie being a satire of the book a conscious choice of verhoeven's?

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

The movie was satire, but they bought the naming rights after establishing most of the movie script to avoid an copyright/IP infringement battle.

It was extremely similar, but it’s more accurate to say it was an entirely separate work than not.

Verhoeven meant it as a commentary on the US militarism rather than on heinlein.

[–] Banana@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

That makes sense!

[–] bort@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Heinlein himself was libertarian

didn't he change his views a couple times during his life?

[–] Throw_away_migrator@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

I dunno, but his dirty old man era was wild

[–] LodeMike 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] Emptiness@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] LodeMike 1 points 5 months ago
[–] DMBFFF@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

At best the movie seems too Poe's law for me.

[–] SaintWacko@midwest.social 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'm sorry, I like most of what you said, but I can't in good conscience upvote someone who thinks the movie was better than the book. It's a fun movie, but, come on...

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I don't know which book/movie this is, so I'll just talk about Jurassic Park instead.

Timmy didn't do his part to help Dr Grant and Ellie Sattler hold the door from the raptor as Lex fiddled with "a unix system! I know this!"

Timmy just danced like he had to pee.

[–] JonDorfman@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

It's Starship Troopers. A sci-fi novel that was later adapted into a movie series. Notably the first movie is a parody of the hyper-militaristic, borderline fascist undertones of American style democracy. The book, on the other hand, was popular in the 1960s.

[–] ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

Starship troopers