492
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] englislanguage@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If the children are young enough, nanna can transfer money to some account the parents control. If the parents are fine, that's fine. However, what if the parents are addicts (drugs, gambling, whatever)? Or what if they are so deep in debt that every cent on their accounts immediately gets turned to whoever the owe to? In that case the kid can't even buy themselves lunch on their own.

I don't think this is a great argument for the prevalence of cash?

What about kids who's nannas don't give them money?

Better to build a society that identifies kids as risk like this rather than prattling on about cash and hoping for the best.

this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2024
492 points (84.0% liked)

Privacy

391 readers
16 users here now

Privacy is the ability for an individual or group to seclude themselves or information about themselves, and thereby express themselves selectively.

Rules

  1. Don't do unto others what you don't want done unto you.
  2. No Porn, Gore, or NSFW content. Instant Ban.
  3. No Spamming, Trolling or Unsolicited Ads. Instant Ban.
  4. Stay on topic in a community. Please reach out to an admin to create a new community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS