this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2024
106 points (90.8% liked)

World News

38978 readers
2833 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

It's this simple. If a single innocent child is between you and your military target, and you kill the child to get to the target, then you're a villain. Are you as much of a villain as the person you killed? Perhaps not. But are you a villain? Yes.

[–] Narauko@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

You are correct, everyone is a villain at that point. The problem with that, as horrible this is, is it incentivizes the action. For the same reason countries don't negotiate with terrorists. If you prove that committing terrorist acts, or taking hostages, or using children as human shields works, you positively reinforce those acts. Its fucked up beyond belief, and all alternatives need to be exhausted, but at some level someone takes the responsibility for where the lines are drawn for the least damage in the long run.

Is it actually preferable to just give money to anyone who hijacks a bus load of people, or a plane, or a bank, etc, so that no hostages are possibly injured when that happens? It might be, and could be argued for. Is such acts becoming more frequent or commonplace because it works an acceptable price weight against innocent human life? Again, it very well might be. It's only money. I am glad I am not the one making those decisions, but we can't pretend that the calculus doesn't happen and/or doesn't matter.

[–] frostmore@lemmy.world -4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

nah,it's simpler, hamas shouldn't be using children as shield like a coward and take what's coming for them like the man they claimed they were.

villian i may be,coward i am not.

[–] MartianRecon@lemmus.org 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yea, bad guys shouldn't use civilians as human shields.

That doesn't give someone else the right to shoot the civilians to kill the bad guys.

[–] frostmore@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

that's true and hamas doesn't give a shit is a child dies. they much prefer to kill the israelis and if the child dies along the way, it's justified.

[–] MartianRecon@lemmus.org 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Without a doubt. Israel shouldn't be killing innocent civilians just because the terrorists are hiding in an apartment building, you know?

[–] frostmore@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

and terrorists like hamas shouldn't be hiding in civilian buildings if they are such holy warriors.

fuck these cowards using civilian as shields.

[–] MartianRecon@lemmus.org 1 points 5 months ago

Yes, you're right. No one is saying they should. Lol.

The point, is that Israel is the 'good guys' and they shouldn't bomb innocent people just because they are being used by the bad guys.

[–] footoro@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Let me quickly condemn Hamas before I step in to tell you that I’m so sick of reading „Hamas uses human shields“. The IDF is quite literally doing the same. Do you condemn the IDF?

That being said, it seems like an absolute waste of energy to use human shields against Israel, because they do not give a shit about civilians. They even shot their own hostages who were naked, unarmed, writing SOS and speaking Hebrew.

According to UN officials this could amount once again to war crimes. Do you think it’s Hamas‘ fault that Israel is committing war crimes? That Israel is committing genocide to name the crime of crimes?

[–] frostmore@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago

i condemn the idf for killing innocents and their own hostage. there isn't any argument concerning the killing of innocents.

i do however hold hamas ultimately accountable for these atrocities if they hadn't started that shit on Oct 7th.

idf is responsible and accountable for sure but the situation today is still ultimately a response to hama's actions and they are ultimately responsible and accountable for the tragedies that's happening.