this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2024
1323 points (93.3% liked)
People Twitter
5029 readers
1890 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a tweet or similar
- No bullying.
- Be excellent to each other.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Okay, most of this is fair play, but saying hunger games did it better? You take that back right now.
Divergent just didn't have the nuance, character depth or world building that the Hunger Games had and I'll stand by that opinion. The divergent movie was a let down to tbh, the book was better. Still not as good as the hunger games tho.
Is the book version of the conspiracy better? I watched the first movie and thought that the supposedly smart caste was pretty braindead.
It seemed like the entire setup was pretty braindead honestly.
Entertaining enough, but nowhere near plausible enough to really get invested in the story.
Same with Hunger Games, honestly.
Hunger Games depicted revolution's harsh but necessary sides in a realistic way, and that elevates it above all other YA I've ever read. Granted I stopped reading YA novels after 16 but still.
Katniss has a real personality, real desires, and loses things because she (thought) she decided to lead a revolution. Only to find out that she wasn't in charge at all and only a figurehead at best, and herself became a victim of the revolution. Nonetheless the revolution was absolutely necessary.
The world of the Hunger Games is much bigger than the teenage protagonists and that's... missing in most of young adult fiction.
That's why The Hunger Games was successful I believe. They treated the audience not as children, but as adults who can consider complex ideas. They just want to read about people their age. Most YA considers their audience as little more than hormone filled idiots.