this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2024
49 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

22845 readers
203 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net
replaceable@hexbear.net
VILenin@hexbear.net
EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net
SexUnderSocialism@hexbear.net
ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net
khizuo@hexbear.net
Sulvor@hexbear.net
49
Where can I find vaguely mystical leftist essays like this? (anatomyof.ai)
submitted 7 months ago by thebartermyth@hexbear.net to c/askchapo@hexbear.net
20 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

While this kind of thing isn't quite 'theory', it definitely has some elements of theory within it, but it also uses very grandiose writing and mythological references. This one seems to be created as a museum exhibit with some connection to Mozilla.

Is there a name for this type of essay or a way I could find more like it? This sort of thing is very fun to read even if it's not serious theory. The subject matter is more or less unimportant to me.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] PM_ME_YOUR_FOUCAULTS@hexbear.net 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Have you ever found anything like it?

Honestly, no. I love stuff that is completely sui generis like that.

I feel like anyone trying to emulate it would fall flat

I agree about emulation. It is also emerges out of the moment where Deleuze and Guattari-influenced Accelerationist theory was all the rage, and that was the context that I read it in. No idea what someone picking it up now would make of it

[โ€“] Parsani@hexbear.net 3 points 7 months ago

I agree about emulation. It is also emerges out of the moment where Deleuze and Guattari-influenced Accelerationist theory was all the rage, and that was the context that I read it in.

I read it much later than that, but I first came across a quote of it in an essay a bit over a decade ago and never forgot it. The book is quite poetic. Anyone not familiar with the CCRU (particularly Land) stuff and D&G would definitely struggle a bit because he freely uses that kind of terminology, but I feel like the writing is compelling enough that someone could still enjoy it without.