this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2024
508 points (99.8% liked)

UK Politics

3091 readers
109 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This should've always been the case.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 27 points 5 months ago

The same way any crime is proven. Once reasonable suspicion has been declared. Warrents are issued for communications etc.

If it is clear their is evidence the person was informed of the fastness of their statements. Then continued to make the claim. Intent to decide is proven.

Honestly we have just seen this with the post office crap. Where members are in court claiming not to have known of errors in evidence used. While the prosecution prooves they did.

Heck the majority of court case has to consider such things.

It is also why some cases are never taken to court. And some folks get off. But is in no way a reason not to make the laws.