Chicago

1053 readers

2 users here now

Welcome to !chicago@midwest.social

where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about Chicago.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil.
No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.
Post anything related to Chicago and the Chicago-land area.

Fediverse Love

Lemmy Communities

Mastodon Servers

banner credit: tim gouw

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

pbrisgreat@midwest.social

simsymbiote@midwest.social

142

Logan Square landlord evicts tenant for flying Palestine flag (chicagoreader.com)

submitted 5 months ago by anachronist@midwest.social to c/chicago@midwest.social

51 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The scumbag also owns the Logan Theater.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ZWQbpkzl@hexbear.net 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Then post articles that say that and not articles that refute your own point. Otherwise you're just being pedantic that no one was killed within the square itself.

[–] QuietCupcake@hexbear.net 3 points 4 months ago

It was not a "massacre."

Then post articles that say that and not articles that refute your own point.

picard Even the title of the first article I posted is "There Was No 'Tiananmen Square Massacre'" It's in the url for chrissakes. This is beyond a failure of reading comprehension, it's a failure to even look at words.

It was not. a. massacre. It is not at all pedantic to point this fact out. Especially when people, following a blatantly propagandist narrative line, incorrectly call it that.

My choosing those two sources specifically among the thousands of others that was to point out how ridiculous it is to ban someone for "denying a massacre" when even mainstream western news sources (in addition to the BBC as was mentioned in the comment that caught that user the ban lol), including one of the most famous mouthpieces for the U.S. government's foreign policy, likewise "deny" that it was a massacre and likewise would have been banned according to the silly mod's standards. Those articles did not at all refute my point, they clearly made it, as should be obvious to anyone able to follow this thread.