112
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Cyv_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 59 points 1 week ago

Ah, so they don't want to pay drivers for down time so they just lock people out of "clocking in" when it's slow. That's pretty shitty. Pay your drivers for being idle, just like you have to pay people for being on call.

[-] Shotgun_Alice@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

That’s some real evil shit right there.

[-] caboose2006@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

No, getting paid to be on call is a good thing/s

[-] Breezy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

People get paid for being on call? I live in the south so maybe things are just different ~~shitty~~ here

[-] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I'm in Texas. They are shitty and looking to downgrade.

[-] Moneo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

My province (BC Canada) is in the process of implementing regulations that force a minimum wage, but only when the driver is "on the job".

My first thought was that uber will just prioritize the fastest (aka most reckless) drivers. This kinda proves that point... I guess we'll see where this all goes.

[-] Mango@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

They don't have to be on call though. They can drop in any time.

this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2024
112 points (100.0% liked)

Work Reform

9428 readers
304 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS