441
submitted 1 week ago by PugJesus@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 week ago

My problem with that is that it's always the same descriptors for that unimaginable horror. Makes them boring if it's always the same.

[-] Andrzej@lemmy.myserv.one 7 points 1 week ago

Also, I feel like both Howard and Lovecraft were prone to incredibly lengthy descriptions of things

[-] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago

Yep, which for them it was fine cause they pioneered the genres but modern writers can't coast on that.

[-] cucumber_sandwich@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

What's a good modern text to approach the genre?

[-] Bertuccio@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The King in Yellow by Robert Chambers is not modern, but it is what inspired Lovecraft, and Chambers is a far better writer. It's several short stories, is pretty accessible, and has some moderate critiques or observations on society that are still relevant.

Important caveats - it's not all horror. Chambers was mostly a romance author who occasionally did horror and it shows near the end of the collection.

The beginning of the first story is pretty jarring to modern sensibilities, but Chambers was probably not a racist, and it was probably meant to be jarring even for readers of the day. It's a story where you have to remember the author is not the narrator.

[-] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

Ada Hoffmann's The Outside. Autistic lesbian theoretical physicist meets Lovecraftian horror.

[-] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Michael Shea's mythos stuff is pretty good I think. 'Demiurge' is a book collecting all his stories. He updates them to the then contemporary 1980s, keeping the elements of cosmic horror but putting them in more modern and relatable situations rather than attempting to make them period pieces.

[-] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Lovecraft's stuff has that reputation, but on a listen through his works, he had a tendency to actually be properly descriptive when it was appropriate. I think it's a case of later, lesser writers gloming onto to making things indescribable as a lazy crutch that made the reputation of the mythos like that.

I think only 'The Unnamable' by Lovecraft really goes incredibly vague at a point where it should be describing the creature, but that story feels like a joke about this exact topic.

this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2024
441 points (98.7% liked)

memes

8657 readers
2438 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS