158
submitted 1 week ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 31 points 1 week ago

I dunno. IMO, he didn't sound terrible. He sounded like an 81 year old who probably shouldn't have been shoved into the nomination but the other frontrunner last time could have forced some representation of the left, so the DNC did it anyway. At least he made an effort to make sentences and call out lies, which the moderators should have.

I hate that our choices are a guy who should be retired vs a nazi that should be retired.

[-] Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 6 days ago

I hate that our choices are a guy who should be retired vs a nazi that should be retired.

Very well said

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 4 points 6 days ago

I was really dissapointed that biden did not discuss trump lowering interest rates to zero before covid when obama had gotten us to a few percent. Zero interest rates is something that is only supposed to be done when there are problems and the economy is not running right and we need a general buff. three to six are normal levels. over six is high. You will always get inflation when interest rates are kept low in an economy that does not need it. This was one reason we could not drop them when covid hit and the reason they had to be raised at breakneck speed which is something you never want to do. They should be lowered and raised very slowly at very slow levels. Idealy quarter of a point or less each time and not ever quarter.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

I didn't watch it, but from what I'm reading this morning, it probably won't change anyone's mind.

[-] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 6 days ago

I did watch it. It was not great but, I'm still left with the impression that people set really unrealistic expectations for an 81 year old with a history of speech impediment. Those things come back in novel ways as we get older. IMO, the whole thing borders on elder abuse but, that's where we're at. Just disappointing to see the "left-wing" (corpo) media immediately on the attack - they seem to be trying to carry more water due Trump.

Also, I am not sure if the shell-shocked look of the talking head before she started speaking was from the debate or the words on the teleprompter.

[-] tamal3@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

As far as I know, Biden chose to run for president again. If that was forced on him, then yes, what's happening is terrible. But if he made that choice freely, then we're only attempting to vet candidates for the job as we always do. If he can't handle the vetting process (as flawed and televised as it is) then he shouldn't be running...

He should be at home chilling, not taking on one of the most demanding possible jobs for another 4 years. His decision making may or may not be fine, but the he obviously can't consistently meet the communication demands of the role.

The alternative is worse, but I'm not happy about voting for Biden. 3rd parties and RCV, please!

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

What's amazing to me is the Trump team set the bar so super low that Biden would have cleared it no matter what and it didn't end up making a difference.

[-] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 6 days ago

Agreed. I didn't think that it would have made much of a difference, however, even if Biden came across as a master orator. "Undecided" folks are probably just going to use whatever they take from it to justify whatever decision they were likely already going to make.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

We need about a week to see what happens with polling. Anyone right now is just reading tea leaves. But uh ... This is the worst debate performance I've seen since Palin. So I can see why party insiders are suddenly discussing things like an open convention in hushed voices.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Okay, but what I'm reading is that Biden sounded like a lost old man and Trump sounded like a crazy old man, which is what everyone already knew about both of them, so I'm not sure why anyone would change their minds.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

Because we know from 2016 and 2020 that Trump's craziness isn't an impediment to him getting votes. We're also in a bubble here on Lemmy. The CNN flash poll they conduct before/after the debate had a 12 point swing towards Trump.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Was that 12 points swinging towards Trump as the debate winner or was that people changing their vote? Because those are very different things. I would be surprised if it were the latter.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

The debate winner. And yeah it's different but also telling when Biden has won easily every other time.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

I really don't think that it's telling at all. I have a very difficult time believing someone would suddenly consider a dictator over the possibility of Kamala Harris stepping in like they hadn't already.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

It's worth remembering that our elections are generally very close. It doesn't take a ton of people in a battle state to change their minds.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

Sure, but there's also a lot of time between now an November.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

That is also true. Another breakpoint coming up is Trump's sentencing. Apparently focus groups report they're less likely to vote for him if he gets a sentence including a jail or prison term.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

There's also that documentary which may or may not come out about Trump being racist during The Apprentice. We'll see if that has an effect.

this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024
158 points (93.4% liked)

News

21721 readers
3265 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS