this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2024
446 points (98.7% liked)

memes

9764 readers
2268 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Andrzej@lemmy.myserv.one 7 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Also, I feel like both Howard and Lovecraft were prone to incredibly lengthy descriptions of things

[–] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Yep, which for them it was fine cause they pioneered the genres but modern writers can't coast on that.

[–] cucumber_sandwich@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (3 children)

What's a good modern text to approach the genre?

[–] Bertuccio@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The King in Yellow by Robert Chambers is not modern, but it is what inspired Lovecraft, and Chambers is a far better writer. It's several short stories, is pretty accessible, and has some moderate critiques or observations on society that are still relevant.

Important caveats - it's not all horror. Chambers was mostly a romance author who occasionally did horror and it shows near the end of the collection.

The beginning of the first story is pretty jarring to modern sensibilities, but Chambers was probably not a racist, and it was probably meant to be jarring even for readers of the day. It's a story where you have to remember the author is not the narrator.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)