this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024
173 points (100.0% liked)

News

23305 readers
3645 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Supreme Court on Friday killed off a judicial doctrine that has protected many federal regulations from legal challenges for decades — delivering a major victory for conservatives and business groups seeking to curb the power of the executive branch.

The 6-3 decision divided the court along ideological lines. Its fallout will make it harder for President Joe Biden or any future president to act on a vast array of policy areas, from wiping out student debt and expanding protections for pregnant workers to curbing climate pollution and regulating artificial intelligence.

Known as Chevron deference, the Reagan-era doctrine required judges to defer to agencies’ “reasonable” interpretations of “ambiguous” federal laws. Now, judges will be freer to impose their own readings of the law — giving them broad leeway to upend regulations on health care, the environment, financial regulations, technology and more.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The executive has "abused" it to do things like stop factories dumping toxic chemicals in rivers.

As I asked you below, how do you think our pro-corporate justice system will rule on such matters?

[–] Fuzemain@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This isn't just about the EPA, this applies to other agencies as well. Including ones that charge individuals for offenses that were lawful prior to a reinterpretation made by unelected officials.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago (2 children)

And it's also about the EPA. And it's about the most important issue in the world- climate change.

And now it's in the hands of a bunch of people who don't even believe it's real and if they do, think the emissions should keep happening anyway because they don't give a shit.

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 months ago

It's an especially egregious ruling since SCOTUS gave companies the same rights as people.

[–] Fuzemain@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Before any new administration can come in, appoint their hacks, and throw off long term climate plans. This also puts power into the legislature (and by that the people) allowing for the enactment of environmental laws that have firm regulations that won't disappear in 4 years. Enabling us to meet long term goals and commitments.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

There will be no long-term climate plans anymore, that's the point. Judges will get rid of them all because the justice system is pro-corporate.

[–] Fuzemain@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This can be circumnavigated by crafting legislation that leaves little for interpretation or judical review. Legislative definitions and unambiguous language have and will always act as handcuffs on the judiciary.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

crafting legislation that leaves little for interpretation or judical review

When has that ever stopped SCOTUS before?

[–] Fuzemain@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

One well know example was the flag burning case with Scalia.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

SCOTUS is currently deciding whether or not the president can legally commit murder. That doesn't even need special legislation. There isn't even a question. And yet SCOTUS is looking into the question. And you want me to trust them with ecological disasters?