175

First Presidential Debate Megapost! (lemmy.world)

submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by jordanlund@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

581 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Here we go, the first Presidential debate between Biden and Trump begins at 9 PM Eastern/6 PM Pacific.

How to watch it:

https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/25/politics/how-to-watch-cnn-debate/index.html

"The CNN Presidential Debate will air live on CNN, CNN International and CNN en Español, and via streaming on Max for subscribers and without a cable login on CNN.com. CNN will make the debate available to simulcast on additional broadcast and cable news networks.

You can also follow CNN’s live debate coverage on CNN.com, which will include analysis and fact checking."

"According to parameters set by CNN in May, all participating debaters had to appear on a sufficient number of state ballots to reach the 270 electoral vote threshold to win the presidency and receive at least 15% in four separate national polls of registered or likely voters that meet CNN’s standards for reporting.

Polls that meet those standards are those sponsored by CNN, ABC News, CBS News, Fox News, Marquette University Law School, Monmouth University, NBC News, The New York Times/Siena College, NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist College, Quinnipiac University, The Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post."

Edit And that's it! Thanks for watching everyone!

tl;dw:

Consensus is Trump didn't so much as beat Biden as Biden beat himself.

The real loser is CNN who failed to fact check anyone, and there were obvious fact checks on both sides.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] JDPoZ@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Smug rich beltway liberals completely detached from reality now get to feel stupid for a second and bewildered as they try to pivot to blaming this again somehow on “tHe LeFt!” (Aka mild social democrats everywhere else in the world)… but otherwise they think they’ll be okay, regardless of if a D or R is in charge (since they STILL don’t seriosuly take the threat of Trump and the far right rising everywhere) since at least they didn’t let some filthy FDR-type who might DARE to raise their taxes by like 0.5% after 6 years or whatever… like Bernie or Warren or Whitmer or Bowman or AOC even get to compete for the primary nomination.

They have doomed the rest of us… and possibly themselves depending now on how successful “Project 2025” is at completely permafucking us all back into the dark ages as the world burns hotter every fucking month.

I still can’t believe that 3 years after January 6th - where they fucking saw some of those goons with fucking ZIP ties - they think they won’t put be up against the bloody poles by mobs whipped up into a frothing frenzy by their demagogue-emperor god.

[-] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago

since at least they didn’t let some filthy FDR-type

FDR threw 200,000 Americans into concentration camps. Even trump never did anything that dark. He was a tyrannical piece of shit and really shouldn't be your metric for progressive politician.

[-] JDPoZ@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

FDR threw 200,000 Americans into concentration camps.

Yep... Congrats, Captain Obvious. Guess what? All presidents are shitty. He also helped us push to start building "the bomb" after Pearl Harbor.

Truman helped pass the Marshal Plan to rebuild all of Europe... but also dropped those 2 atomic bombs on civilian cities, killing tens of thousands of innocent civilians.
LBJ got us in to Vietnam proper. But he also pushed to pass the Civil Rights Act.
Obama passed the Affordable Healthcare Act, but increased drone strikes 10-fold.
Eisenhower gave us the Interstate Highway, but went along with anti-left coups all over South America (lots of the other presidents also did this sort of stuff, too, unfortunately)
FDR passed social security, helped get us out of the Great Depression, passed the GI bill, made electricity accessible to rural areas, gave us the Warren court - AKA the only non-conservative Supreme court in the last 100 years (Miranda rights, Brown v Board of education, right to attorney even if you can't afford it, etc.)

So I count FDR on the RELATIVE (not absolute) "good" side of US presidents... who are all shitty overall to lesser degrees at best.

[-] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

I'd rather focus on the negative. Take away what these bastards value most, their legacy. A bad person who does a few good things is still a bad person and should be remembered as a bad person. If future presidents see them getting dragged through the mud instead of lauded because MUH FREE MONEY maybe they'd think twice about being dickbags.

who are all shitty overall to lesser degrees at best.

Lesser degrees? Really? Lesser than putting Americans in concentration camps? Yeah, some were worse, but FDR isn't anywhere near the top of the 'good guy' scale. At best he's somewhere in the middle.

[-] JDPoZ@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

FDR isn't anywhere near the top of the 'good guy' scale. At best he's somewhere in the middle.

Please enlighten me - name a handful of options who would be “near the top” - or hell… just above FDR? I’m curious to know who would go there besides Abraham Lincoln.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago

I'd go there.

Elect me.

I totally promise not to be an asshole.

(Oh, I'd totally be an asshole.) (but I'd happily ram a progressive agenda down people's throats anyway....) (still. Don't vote for me.)

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (3 replies)

this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2024

175 points (98.9% liked)

politics

18062 readers

4347 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News