this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2024
1122 points (96.9% liked)

Fuck AI

1435 readers
326 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] m4xie@slrpnk.net 3 points 4 months ago (5 children)

When people judge this, can they please consider those for whom English is not a first language?

[–] trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

If a text is out of your reach currently you can get to it later, as your skill in it improves.

When you do this you're just reading a completely different (worse) book.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 8 points 4 months ago

Even someone for whom English is an acquired language can appreciate literature. Being an English learner doesn’t make a person incapable of reading English literature.

[–] Kerred@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

A better question for me in that case is what is it charging and what are better alternatives

[–] Hackworth@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

Our textual selves exist in !fuck_ai@lemmy.world. This is not a semantic space with room for consideration. AI Bad.

... or people with literacy issues, learning difficulties, or intellectual handicaps.

Sure, "simplifying" a literary classic in this way may be in poor taste (although there already exist human written versions in easy language for english language learners), but using this for things like forms, letters, manuals, lists of instructions et cetera will be invaluable to a lot of people for whom it simply isn't possible to simply learn more words.