this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2024
707 points (97.3% liked)

Asklemmy

43494 readers
1932 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 47 points 3 months ago (2 children)

For me personally the first tell is when they are morally loading every statement in an argument and are unable to engage with a topic directly. Adults should be able to discuss or debate certain topics on the value of the arguments alone without feeling pressured to include a declarative virtue signal in every clause.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't know. I've had this issue with some adults as well.

[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Me too. But in my view they are not fully developed adults and still have some emotional intelligence left to grow.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Maybe I'm not understanding it correctly. Could you maybe provide a small example? :)

[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Usually when discussing a heated topic (politics, gun control-take your pick) and trying to discuss the facts of the matter in a neutral manner but the response comes back with every phrase super charged with morally loaded words. Examples of a conversation I had recently (emphasis mine):

sure as hell isn’t PANDERING! What the fuck is wrong with you??

Typical apologist tactic

PRETENDING to care about the brutal slaughter of tens of thousands of innocent civilians

deflecting to your conspiracy theory

shows that YOU don’t care enough about Palestinian lives

It's very pronounced on this site for some reason. I don't know why.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 months ago

I assume the quoted part is all one comment from the other party?
Just asking because the formatting looks a bit like conversation.

Besides that, yeah it reads really immature and emotionally charged to the moon and back.

[–] chobeat@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

"debate me" kids are another stereotype on the internet though. The idea that ideas should be entertained and discussed for the sake of it and come without implications attached is just another form of edgyness. It's another thing that often goes away with age or with touching grass. I know because I was one of them. Now I understand that the fact itself of discussing something publicly has moral implications.

[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Yea, I agree. That's why I used the word discuss because when the debate-bro mindset kicks in you're definitely dealing with an angsty teenager (also the constant invocation of logical fallacies).