(for anyone who doesn't see, check in the very back of the edited photo)
this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2024
317 points (94.4% liked)
Funny
6820 readers
495 users here now
General rules:
- Be kind.
- All posts must make an attempt to be funny.
- Obey the general sh.itjust.works instance rules.
- No politics or political figures. There are plenty of other politics communities to choose from.
- Don't post anything grotesque or potentially illegal. Examples include pornography, gore, animal cruelty, inappropriate jokes involving kids, etc.
Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Looks like she was photoshopped into both pictures actually.
I was looking at that too. Hard to say for sure, I'm not a digital forensic, but it looks kind of that way. Which would explain how he had the full details of the man behind her.
I don't think this guy would pull that. He's pretty popular for his photoshop skills.
I'm with OP, it's waaaaay too good to be a reconstructed picture of the dude and background.
Edit: okay, upon close inspection, it seems like it's really are shopped, a few detail of that man doesn't makes sense(the sling bag goes the wrong way and his left shoe got painted over a bit), seems like he actually painted the guy. That's super pro
Also, the floor pattern where her left calf was (our right), is blended over rather than having the pattern's white knot design. So it seems he definitely moved her with a photoshop. Still crazy how well he rendered the rest of the man in the background. The dude's too good to seem real, which is an awesome compliment imo