People Twitter

5377 readers

1134 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a tweet or similar
No bullying or international politcs
Be excellent to each other.
Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

711

Goofy stuff like this gives the neighborhood some character (lemmy.world)

submitted 5 months ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

51 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It was a Santa skeleton on display in late January/early February that I hadn't taken down yet in case it wasn't clear. The law for my city is no holiday decorations more than 30 days past the holiday. (I live in the incorporated area of the city, it's possible if I lived in the unincorporated area the laws might be more lenient. Though I do not live in the so-called historic district.)

It's easy to get pissed off about it but the reality is they didn't cite me for a Halloween decoration in December, they accepted that it was not a Christmas decoration because of the Santa hat. (Something we did for fun, not to get around a law.) So they were already being pretty lenient. Also, it's not like the citation showed up immediately on the 31st day once we didn't take it down. And we didn't get a fine or anything.

It still made me upset, but all things considered it was pretty tame.

Next year we might make it into a Valentine's Skeleton but do it before the 30 day mark from Christmas. It's probably easier to dodge a citation than argue that my Halloween Skeleton is no longer an infringing Christmas Decoration but instead now a Valentine's Skeleton because I gave it a little Cupid's Bow or something instead of a Santa Hat. Know what I mean? It makes sense in my head. Not sure if I'm explaining it well over text. Sort of similar to those "harder to ask permission" type situations.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

That kind of ordnance would annoy me enough that I'd fight it. Keeping a skeleton up year round doesn't hurt anyone, it's merely a visual annoyance to your neighbors. I would fight that law on first amendment grounds, since keeping a skeleton up year round is absolutely an exercise of free speech, therefore the law is unconstitutional.

Yeah it's petty, but I'm totally willing to fight an unjust law with petty civil disobedience.