this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2024
964 points (95.6% liked)

Just Post

592 readers
62 users here now

Just post something ๐Ÿ’›

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Zorque@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

She was supposed to have the foresight to assume that the six months or so when they had a majority (when they passed ACA) was the last time Democrats would have the slightest hope of appointing a new supreme court justice.

What a fool she was! Not knowing the future!

[โ€“] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

The house does not vote on judges. Only the Senate. Obama had a friendly Senate until Jan 2015. They could even have done it during the lame duck session. But in reality the Senate was widely forecasted to change control so she could have retired in the spring without controversy.

[โ€“] Zorque@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

But they didn't have the supermajority necessary to overcome a filibuster anymore. Even the cloture rule enacted in 2013 excluded supreme court nominations.

[โ€“] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

And that would have been gone in a hot second if they blocked RBG's replacement. They removed exactly what they needed to confirm judges.