this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2024
858 points (96.8% liked)

Science Memes

10940 readers
1952 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Contravariant@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Just because you don't know what the uncertainties are doesn't mean they're not there.

Most optimization problems can trivially be turned into a statistics problem.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Most optimization problems can trivially be turned >into a statistics problem.

Sure if you mean turning your error function into some sort of likelihood by employing probability distributions that relate to your error function.

But that is only the beginning. Apart from maybe Bayesian neural networks, I haven't seen much if any work on stuff like confidence intervals for your weights or prediction intervals for the response (that being said I am only a casual follower on this topic).

[–] Contravariant@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

One of the better uses I've seen involved using this perspective to turn what was effectively a maximum likelihood fit into a full Gaussian model to make the predicted probabilities more meaningful.

Not that it really matters much how the perspective is used, what's important is that it's there.