this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024
1292 points (98.2% liked)

People Twitter

5283 readers
261 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wolfpack86@lemmy.world 58 points 4 months ago (2 children)

This is the product of clinics being owned by corporations chasing a specific return, and not being owned by a local group of physicians who actually want to care for people.

Shop local applies.

[–] JayTreeman@fedia.io 20 points 4 months ago (1 children)

We get the same issue in Ontario with family health teams. The structure of the corporation matters, but so does the funding model

[–] Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Sometimes I wonder though if it's because drs get to bill OHIP per visit as well so if you try to squeeze more than one complaint in in a visit then they only get to bill once.

[–] JayTreeman@fedia.io 4 points 4 months ago

That is what I meant by the funding model. What we're talking about is fee for service. More service equals more money. There's other funding models though.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 4 points 4 months ago

It's also a product of poor government funding models. We have universal healthcare in my country, and it works great for anything hospital-related. But GPs had the amount they get paid by the government frozen for nearly a decade as costs continued to rise, and once unfrozen, no effort was made to make up for the lost decade. So GPs are forced to either charge out the arse for private fees, or operate on a ruthless patient-unfriendly schedule to maximise throughput just to be able to make ends meet.