this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024
664 points (99.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

19503 readers
338 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Feyter@programming.dev
anzo@programming.dev
BurningTurtle@programming.dev
pylapp@programming.dev
664
They did not reply. (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 4 months ago by baggachipz@sh.itjust.works to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev
57 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cheddar@programming.dev 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The young method returns a boolean parameter. Females have a different type for obvious biological discrepancies that require extra functionality.

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I can accept your second point, but in your PR I would absolutely request you to rename the method to isYoung, and then in making said comment I would then ask… what value isYoung providing, and where is the line between young and !young ultimately for trying to get the dev to reevaluate the design. It’s hyper specific in an obtuse manner and I think it hints at design flaws especially with the perspective of product evolution