this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2024
54 points (64.8% liked)

United States | News & Politics

1939 readers
332 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 26 points 4 months ago (3 children)

wouldn't it be infinitely easier to just make him win, let him croak, and get harris in the job rather than have to start a campaign for her from scratch? within a few months?

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 26 points 4 months ago

The assumption here is that you can make him win, which is far from a given. Democrats win when turnout is high, and turnout is high when voters are enthusiastic about their candidate. "Vote for the senile guy! It's OK, he's gonna die soon," isn't a message that inspires enthusiasm.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago

This is why people say "you vote for an administration, not just a president".

[–] Pat_Riot 3 points 4 months ago

That doesn't give the same click inducing headlines though. Sewing doubt and spreading bullshit, however, drives up their ad revenue. All these so called polling numbers are fucking made up.