Technology

59574 readers

3219 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

337

"Privacy-Preserving" Attribution: Mozilla Disappoints Us Yet Again (blog.privacyguides.org)

submitted 4 months ago by MissingInteger@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world

115 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[+] hotpot8toe@lemmy.world 67 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

[deleted]

[–] fin@sh.itjust.works 19 points 4 months ago (2 children)

99% of their users are not these things

I don't think so. People using Firefox are freaking evangelists trying to spread privacy. And if Firefox should lose those people, it will truly be the end

[+] hotpot8toe@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

[deleted]

[–] Paradox@lemdro.id 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

And these days, privacy is basically the only appeal of Firefox. It's slower than chrome or webkit based browsers, hangs out with Safari in terms of standards support, and can't hold a candle to either other browser when it comes to battery life. Why mozilla seems determined to throw that all away is beyond me

[–] ParetoOptimalDev 7 points 4 months ago

The last time I looked at performance and energy benchmarks Firefox was winning.

[–] Feyd@programming.dev 0 points 4 months ago

It’s slower than chrome or webkit based browsers, hangs out with Safari in terms of standards support, and can’t hold a candle to either other browser when it comes to battery life.

Sources?

[–] mrvictory1@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

FF users include both normal people and freaking evangelists trying to spread privacy.

[–] Don_alForno@feddit.de 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Privacy based advertizing:

Develop ad
Think about what websites your target demographic will probably frequent. (Be creative, dear marketing person! You can do it! This is the essence of what you're getting paid for!)
Pay those sites to display your ad

Done.

Forget about the technical details and whether the user understands what it is.

No. Why? It's simple. They are collecting data I don't want the ad networks to have instead of the ad networks and give it to the ad networks. That's only more private than the status quo if I'm okay with them to have this data and trust them to handle it responsibly. Which I have no reason to.

which is why they correctly say that the user won't understand the Feature.

See explanation above. That's not too complicated to explain to a person that managed to turn on the computer. It only gets complicated when you try to follow the mental gymnastics you need to think this feature adds privacy for anybody.

[–] narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee 5 points 4 months ago

This exactly. We don't need some in-between "compromise".